Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

metaphysics

Cyclamen-coum
Photo: Cyclamen coum, by Famberhorst, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Science, Purpose, and Michael Levin: The Discussion Evolves

A leading spiritually agnostic (at least, that is my impression) biology researcher, Michael Levin at Tufts, is himself a proponent of teleology in nature. Read More ›
Darwin's shoes
Photo: Detail of Darwin statue, Natural History Museum, London, by Rept0n1x (Own work) [GFDL or CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

Darwinism as Fact? The Waning of an Historical Myth 

Historically the unfathomable subtleties of our terrestrial environment have been viewed as in and of themselves empirical markers for design. Read More ›
illustration-of-close-up-chess-board-idea-for-tactic-and-str-572938688-stockpack-adobestock
illustration of close-up chess board idea for tactic and strategy background theme, Generative Ai
Image Credit: QuietWord - Adobe Stock

From the Craig-Carroll Encounter, Discerning the Next Move on the Atheist Intellectual Chessboard

As you may know, William Lane Craig debated physicist Sean Carroll in New Orleans last weekend. Read More ›
brain
Image credit: GoodIdeas - Adobe Stock

Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Jeffrey Shallit

Materialist mathematician Jeffrey Shallit has a post on an article in the Globe and Mail about philosophy and the immateriality of the mind. Shallit’s post is titled “Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Philosophy”. Shallit doesn’t think much of philosophy: If philosophers think the view that “The brain is not an organ of consciousness. … The brain has no cognitive powers at all” deserves anything more than a good horselaugh, this simply shows how irrelevant philosophy has become … Our future understanding of cognition will come from neuroscience, not from Wittgenstein. Philosophy is plainly irrelevant to Shallit, which is the problem. Wittgenstein may not inform Dr. Shallit’s understanding of cognition, but Descartes, Kant, Hume, James, Skinner, Block, the Churchlands, Read More ›

© Discovery Institute