Category: Scientific Reasoning

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
April 11, 2026

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, americans, biology, cosmology, creator, Darwinian theory, Declaration of Independence, endowed by our creator, ethnicity, fine-tuning, genetics, governance, ID the Future, John West, moral relativism, morality, natural law, physics, podcast, rights, scientific discoveries, scientific racism, soul, truths}

Why Darwinian Theory Threatens the Declaration of Independence

_{Andrew McDiarmid
April 11, 2026

Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

2}

Dr. John West highlights how modern scientific discoveries in biology, physics, and cosmology are now reinforcing the core claims of the Declaration. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
April 10, 2026

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, americans, conscience, Declaration of Independence, endowed by our creator, equality, Founders, ID the Future, intelligent designer, John West, liberty, limited government, moral design, natural philosophy, philosophy, revelation, rights, scientific consensus, scientific discoveries, Scripture, theology, virtue}

The Science Behind the Declaration of Independence

_{Andrew McDiarmid
April 10, 2026

Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

2}

The scientific consensus of the Founders’ era confirmed the truths of the Declaration. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Terrell Clemmons

Date
April 10, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, coherence theory of truth, consensus, consensus theory of truth, consequences, correspondence view of truth, Darwinism, Darwinists, evolution, intelligent design, J. Budziszewski, Napoleon, Pandemic of Lunacy, poached eggs, pragmatism, pragmatist philosophers, reality, schizophrenics, scientific controversy, snow, status signaling, truth, white}

What’s So Hard About Scientific Controversy? Addressing Bad Theories of Truth

_{Terrell Clemmons
April 10, 2026

Evolution, Scientific Reasoning

5}

The consensus theory says that truth is whatever we all agree about. Needless to say, that fits right into what we were saying about status signaling. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Terrell Clemmons

Date
April 9, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Medicine
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Blaise Pascal, COVID-19, Darwinism, epidemiologists, experts, global cooling, global warming, Great Barrington Declaration, House Select Committee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, intelligent design, J. Budziszewski, Jonathan Haidt, journalists, medical professionals, Pandemic of Lunacy, People for the American Way, political debates, psychologist, schools, scientists, University of Texas at Austin, workplaces}

Questioning the Science Experts: Is It Even Permitted?

_{Terrell Clemmons
April 9, 2026

Evolution, Medicine, Scientific Reasoning

9}

If you're trying to do ID science, it's a little bit easier to be intellectually honest, because you have to work harder to make the case for your claim. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Terrell Clemmons

Date
April 7, 2026

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Aldous Huxley, Bible, biology, chemists, Darwinism, intelligent design, J. Budziszewski, jobs, materialistic paradigm, meaning, media, morality, natural law theory, Pandemic of Lunacy, peer pressure, Phillip Johnson, promotion, snake handlers, social status, status signaling, University of Texas at Austin, yahoos}

Status Signaling in the Herd: Why Otherwise Good Scientists Sneer at Intelligent Design

_{Terrell Clemmons
April 7, 2026

Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

7}

"Here is Johnson, giving a very studious argument for ID, and the other fellow thinks it’s sufficient to say, 'I know it's wrong because my friend told me.'" Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Terrell Clemmons

Date
March 24, 2026

Categories
Political Science
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Alexis de Tocqueville, anarchists, authority, birds, capitalists, Christianity, Christians, conformism, Congress, Dorothy Sayers, England, ethics, evil, faith and reason, food, good, intellectual authority, J. Budziszewski, Jews, Karl Marx, laboratory animals, libertarians, murmurations, mysteries, nonbelievers, Pandemic of Lunacy, Politics, pro-choice, public opinion, right, sanity, socialists, souls, status, status signaling, virtue signaling, wokeness, wrong}

The Flocking of Crowds: The Secular University and Unstable Mass Conformism

_{Terrell Clemmons
March 24, 2026

Political Science, Scientific Reasoning

10}

A bird sees another bird next to him fluttering, and he wants to flutter that way, too. Read More ›

Close up of mouth and red lips swallowing white capsule medecine pill

^{Type
post

Author
Terrell Clemmons

Date
March 23, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, abortion, atheists, Aztecs, Baal, biologists, boyfriend, Center for Science and Culture, deception, epiphany, feminists, Gone with the Wind, habitual knowledge, intelligent design, irrationality, J. Budziszewski, knowledge, libido, lightness, lunacy, materialists, motivated irrationality, Pandemic of Lunacy, particles, purity, rational minds, rationalizations, reconciliatory urge, Richard Lewontin, Romans, Scarlett O'Hara, scientific knowledge, sexual drive, Sigmund Freud, truth}

Motivated Irrationality: Why Even Smart People Swallow Crackpot Ideas

_{Terrell Clemmons
March 23, 2026

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

11}

A critic will just fling out an objection, intelligent design thinkers will reply, and the reply is totally ignored. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Neil Thomas

Date
March 16, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Philosophy
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Adrian Desmond, Against the Professors, Albert Einstein, ancient Greece, aphasia, arithmeticians, Arthur Eddington, Arthur Koestler, astrologers, ataraxia, Carlo Rovelli, Charles Darwin, Charles Sanders Peirce, Chrysippus, Das Wesen des Christentums, David Hume, epistemology, Erasmus Darwin, False Messiah, Friedrich Nietzsche, geometers, grammarians, J. B. Bury, J. B. S. Haldane, James Moore, Jerry Coyne, John Dewey, Ludwig Feuerbach, Marcus du Sautoy, Max Planck, musicians, natural preservation, natural selection, Neal Gillespie, New Atheists, Newtonian mechanics, Niels Bohr, Origin of Species, philosophy, Pierre Bayle, Pons Malleus, Pyrrho, revisions, rhetors, Sanford G. Etheridge, Sextus Empiricus, Sir Charles Lyell, Steve Taylor, The Descent of Man, Werner Heisenberg, Why Evolution Is True, William James, William Shakespeare}

Darwin’s Doubts, and Their Philosophical Implications

_{Neil Thomas
March 16, 2026

Evolution, Philosophy, Scientific Reasoning

14}

Charles Darwin thus appears to us more modern than his present-day disciples, whose unbending materialism comes closer to that of Erasmus Darwin. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 25, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, Adobe Acrobat, analogy, Animal Operating System, animals, bilaterians, biology departments, body plans, Charles Darwin, Ernst Mayr, European Molecular Biology Organization, evolution, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary theory, gene regulatory networks, George Gaylord Simpson, graves, mutations, natural selection, operating systems, Ronald Fisher, smartphones, The EMBO Journal, Theodosius Dobzhansky, zombies}

Another Hypothesis for the Origin of Animals

_{Science & Culture
February 25, 2026

Evolution, Scientific Reasoning

2}

This one uses an analogy to the origin of smartphones. No kidding. Yet, it’s an interesting article. Just not really evolutionary theory in any normal sense. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
February 14, 2026

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, beta-lactamase, Cambridge, Casey Luskin, cookies, design intuition, Douglas Axe, dragonflies, England, enzymes, ID the Future, mutation, peer-reviewed research, philosophers, podcasts, protein scientists, The Comprehensive Guide to Science and Faith, theophobes, Undeniable (book)}

Axe and Luskin on the Design Intuition and Its Critics

_{Andrew McDiarmid
February 14, 2026

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Scientific Reasoning

2}

The numbers don’t lie. So why do so many academic biologists and other scholars resist the design implications of Axe’s research? Read More ›