Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Category

Philosophy of Science

Screenshot-2026-04-21-at-30851PM-2
Photo: Matt Fradd and Stephen Meyer, via Pints with Aquinas (screenshot).

Meyer, Fradd: Atheist Evolutionists Reason as if They Were Theists

Only a loving Deity who endowed us with reason — a highly unnatural gift! — can explain why we are able to think rationally, including about science. Read More ›
Stephen_Hawking_at_Kennedy_Space_Center_Shuttle_Landing_Facility_KSC-07pd-0946
Photo credit: Kim Shiflett, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

What Grand Design? On Stephen Hawking’s Loophole

In their 2010 book, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow set out to answer a big question. Read More ›
James-Orr
Photo: James Orr and Stephen Meyer, via First Light/YouTube (screenshot).

Stephen Meyer in Cambridge: Natural Theology or Intelligent Design?

Adds James Orr, “You might call it non-natural theology in that your argument around mathematics and information is that it's not naturalistically explicable. Read More ›
KarlPopper1902-1994Nr104bustbronzeintheArkade
Photo: Karl Popper, University of Vienna, © Hubertl / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0.

On Natural Selection, Popper’s Posthumous Gift

If philosopher of science Karl Popper wanted to leave a gift for those who came after to puzzle over and discuss, he couldn’t have chosen more astutely. Read More ›
MichaelLevin
Photo credit: Kriegman, S., Blackiston, D., Levin, M., Bongard, J., CC BY 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Michael Levin and the Philosophy of Intelligent Design

Levin is not a reflexive Darwinian materialist. Moreover, he touches on many themes that intelligent design theorists touch on. Read More ›
digital-illustration-of-a-dna-stockpack-adobe-stock-32859465-stockpack-adobestock
Digital illustration of a dna
Image Credit: adimas - Adobe Stock

In Search of a Unified Theory of Life

It can be said that Erwin Schrödinger anticipated what Michael Behe formally articulated as irreducible complexity. Read More ›
SpaceXCrew-10launchesaboardaSpaceXFalcon9rocketcarr
Photo credit: Aubrey Gemignani, courtesy of NASA, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons.

Science Without Materialism: Yes, It Would Still Work

What if we assume that our minds really are immaterial? Math still adds up, physics and chemistry are still true, logic still works. Read More ›
Candlewithholder
Photo credit: Gaurav Dhwaj Khadka, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

Taking the Side of Science — But Which Side?

In writing that science’s materialism is absolute, Richard Lewontin wrote as one who did not grasp the fatal flaw in his absolutism. Read More ›
EasterIsland16491363758
Photo credit: Mike W. from Vancouver, Canada, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons.

How Did the Designer Do It? 

It seems the debate has not progressed much in a century and a half. Clearly, these evolutionary theorists think they have an unanswerable line of attack here. Read More ›
sand-with-tractor-wheel-tread-on-it-stockpack-adobe-stock-429262050-stockpack-adobestock
sand with tractor wheel tread on it
Image Credit: phantom1311 - Adobe Stock

Are Scientists Allowed to Consider Unscientific Explanations? 

Let’s consider a narrower field. Geology, as everyone knows, is concerned with the natural processes that act upon the earth. Read More ›

© Discovery Institute