Science and Culture Today Discovering Design in Nature
Topic

fallibility

file-drawer
Photo credit: Jakub Żerdzicki via Unsplash.

How the “Scientific Community” Undermines Its Own Trustworthiness

The “file drawer problem” leads invariably to biased reporting. It refers to scientists deciding not to report negative results. Read More ›
Galileo
Galileo
Image: Statue of Galileo outside Carnegie Museums of Pittsburgh, by Daderot [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons.

The Galileo Affair — A Durable Myth

The problem with science, as Del Ratzsch has pointed out, is that it is done by people. Read More ›
wooden-defendant-dock-in-historic-courtroom-interior-stockpa-1553226191-stockpack-adobestock
Wooden Defendant Dock in Historic Courtroom Interior
Image Credit: scorpiries2004 - Adobe Stock

Darwin in the Dock: C.S. Lewis’s Critique of "Evolutionism"

By highlighting the all-too-human frailties of modern science, Lewis made his most important contribution to the evolution debate. Read More ›
concept-of-substance-addiction-the-struggle-and-journey-of-i-568074095-stockpack-adobestock
Concept of substance addiction. The struggle and journey of individuals affected by the condition. Ai Generated.
Image Credit: ankreative - Adobe Stock

How a Scientific Field Can Collapse: The Case of Psychiatry

Psychiatry is in crisis. Leading journals are questioning its validity as a science. Yet some of the same criticisms could be leveled against Darwinism. Read More ›
brain
Image credit: GoodIdeas - Adobe Stock

Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Jeffrey Shallit

Materialist mathematician Jeffrey Shallit has a post on an article in the Globe and Mail about philosophy and the immateriality of the mind. Shallit’s post is titled “Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Philosophy”. Shallit doesn’t think much of philosophy: If philosophers think the view that “The brain is not an organ of consciousness. … The brain has no cognitive powers at all” deserves anything more than a good horselaugh, this simply shows how irrelevant philosophy has become … Our future understanding of cognition will come from neuroscience, not from Wittgenstein. Philosophy is plainly irrelevant to Shallit, which is the problem. Wittgenstein may not inform Dr. Shallit’s understanding of cognition, but Descartes, Kant, Hume, James, Skinner, Block, the Churchlands, Read More ›

© Discovery Institute