Tag: Del Ratzsch

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 8, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, Biological Information: New Perspectives, censorship, defining terms, Del Ratzsch, dependency graph, Elsevier, explanatory filter, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, macroevolution, Michael Behe, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), peer-reviewed, publishers, search engines, specified complexity, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections

_{Casey Luskin
October 8, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

6}

The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 10, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Black Box, Del Ratzsch, evolutionary mechanism, Irreducible Complexity, Jonathan Witt, Michael Behe, molecular machines, podcast}

Michael Behe on the Design Idea That Won’t Go Away (and Shouldn’t)

_{Science and Culture
February 10, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Charles Darwin himself told us how his evolutionary theory could be overturned. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Douglas Axe

Date
March 6, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Tagged
, __k-review, accuracy, Darwinism, Del Ratzsch, design intuition, evolutionary biology, functional coherence, Hans Vodder, intuition, Neil deGrasse Tyson, organisms, probability, theistic evolution, Undeniable (book)}

Why Certainty Doesn’t Always Require Accuracy — A $5 Lesson in Probability

_{Douglas Axe
March 6, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Mathematics

7}

As our dialogue continues, I think I’m starting to understand your position more clearly. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Douglas Axe

Date
December 18, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __nedited, coincidences, Del Ratzsch, design intuition, dragonfly, functional coherence, Hans Vodder, hummingbird, intelligent design, Mars rover, monkey, natural processes, Neo-Darwinism, probabilities, probability, Star Trek, theistic evolution, Undeniable (book)}

The Calculation-Free Design Intuition and the Calculations That Validate It

_{Douglas Axe
December 18, 2017

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

7}

From childhood, we all naturally ascribe things like spiders and hummingbirds to a “God-like designer.” But are we right to do this? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Cornelius Hunter

Date
September 12, 2017

Categories
Environment & Climate
Faith & Science
Physical Sciences
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __nedited, “consensus science”, catastrophism, climate change, coercion, Del Ratzsch, epicycles, fallibility, Galileo Affair, Galileo Galilei, heliocentrism, Johannes Kepler, mythology, perverse incentives, Quartz, rhetorical strategies, Roman Catholic, science, scientism, suppressed evidence, technocracy, Tycho Brahe, Warfare Thesis}

The Galileo Affair — A Durable Myth

_{Cornelius Hunter
September 12, 2017

Environment & Climate, Faith & Science, Physical Sciences, Scientific Trustworthiness

6}

The problem with science, as Del Ratzsch has pointed out, is that it is done by people. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jay W. Richards

Date
February 15, 2010

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, causation, Church Fathers, definist fallacy, Del Ratzsch, design detection, evidence for id, exoplanets, explanatory filter, extra-terrestrial intelligence, eye, foresight, intervention, Irreducible Complexity, methodological pluralism, Michael Behe, miracles, natural laws, natural processes, positive case for design, Roman Catholicism, secondary causation, straw man, teleology, theism, theistic evolution, theology}

How to Completely Misunderstand Intelligent Design: A Response to Stephen Barr

_{Jay W. Richards
February 15, 2010

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

14}

Catholic physicist Stephen Barr is a constitutionally uncharitable critic of ID. It's not clear that he has even read the books that he criticizes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 5, 2005

Categories
Astronomy
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __nedited, astrophysics, Del Ratzsch, extra-terrestrial intelligence, Search for ExtraTerrestrial Intelligence, SETI, signal, William A. Dembski}

Dembski responds to Anti-ID article by SETI Astronomer

_{Casey Luskin
December 5, 2005

Astronomy, Intelligent Design

2}

Shostak's argument is that SETI doesn't search for intelligent design, but rather "artificiality" in the universe. Read More ›