peer-reviewed
In Mainstream Journal, ID Theorists Explore “Waiting Times” for Coordinated Mutations
Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections
Self-Induced Blindness: Round 3 with Kevin Williamson
Two Kinds of Science “Skepticism”
Peer-Reviewed Scientific Paper Develops New Ways of Measuring Complex and Specified Information in Life
Peer-Reviewed Article on Transposable Elements Cites “Irreducible Complexity” and Other “Teleologic” Factors
No ID Research? Let’s Help Out This Iowa State Student
As the Intelligent Design Movement Publishes Peer-Reviewed Literature, Critics Backpedal
New Peer-Reviewed Paper Challenges Darwinian Evolution
Over recent months, papers challenging key elements of Darwinian theory — the kind of papers which are supposed not to exist — have increasingly been slipping through the net and finding their way into the peer-reviewed literature. One such paper, “Is gene duplication a viable explanation for the origination of biological information and complexity?,” authored by Joseph Esfandier Hannon Bozorgmeh and published online last week in the journal, Complexity, challenges the standard gene duplication/divergence model regarding the origin of evolutionary novelty. The abstract reports, All life depends on the biological information encoded in DNA with which to synthesize and regulate various peptide sequences required by an organism’s cells. Hence, an evolutionary model accounting for the diversity of life needs to Read More ›