Tag: Kevin Williamson

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 20, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Human Exceptionalism
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __trending, 1 percent myth, 1 percent myth (series), burying the lede, chimpanzees, common ancestry, David Klinghoffer, DNA, gap difference, genomes, human exceptionalism, humans, Icons of Evolution, Jonathan Wells, Kevin Williamson, Museum of Natural History, National Review, Nature (journal), science journalism, Smithsonian Institution, statistics, Supplementary Data, zombies}

Bombshell: New Research Overturns Claim that Humans and Chimps Differ by Only 1 Percent of DNA

_{Casey Luskin
May 20, 2025

Evolution, Human Exceptionalism, Human Origins and Anthropology

7}

This finding should be major news in the science world, yet those involved don’t seem interested in highlighting the discovery. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 9, 2019

Categories
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Physics
Tagged
, __edited, Big Bang, Brian Josephson, Canadians, Charles Townes, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, National Review, Nobel Prize, physical existence, Princeton University, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer, Wall Street Journal}

Physics Nobel Prize Invites Snark from the Anti-ID Peanut Gallery

_{David Klinghoffer
October 9, 2019

Cosmology, Intelligent Design, Physics

3}

Insofar as Peebles’s work helps to strengthen the evidence for a cosmic beginning, it is actually part of the argument for intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 4, 2019

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Alfred Russel Wallace, Aristotle, Ben Shapiro, Cambridge University, Charles Darwin, Dallas, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute, Eric Metaxas, faith, Guillermo Gonzalez, intellectuals, intelligent design, James Tour, Jay Richards, John West, Kevin Williamson, philosophers, Plato, Return of the God Hypothesis, science, Signature in the Cell, Socrates in the City, Stephen Meyer, Texas}

Now on YouTube — Stephen Meyer, Eric Metaxas on the Return of the God Hypothesis

_{David Klinghoffer
April 4, 2019

Biology, Cosmology, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

3}

It’s a great, great privilege to work with brilliant scientists who do such an amazing job of explaining the science that lies behind the deepest questions men and women can ask themselves. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 3, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, Charles Darwin, Christians, dentists, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, intelligent design, journalists, Kevin Williamson, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, National Review, Nobel laureates, poets, Richard Lenski, Scientific Dissent from Darwin, The Quarterly Review of Biology, Wikipedia}

Science and Its Consequences: Kevin Williamson Versus Intelligent Design, Again

_{David Klinghoffer
April 3, 2019

Biochemistry, Science Reporting

5}

The question before us was whether anyone but journalists and other amateurs take the science of ID, “daft rube-bait” according to Kevin, seriously. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
January 31, 2019

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, David Klinghoffer, Douglas Axe, Eugene Koonin, eukaryotic cell, Irreducible Complexity, Kevin Williamson, Lehigh University, molecular evolution, multiverse, National Academy of Sciences, National Institutes of Health, National Review, PNAS, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Richard Sternberg, Scott Minnich, stem, Stephen Meyer, The Edge of Evolution, theoretical biology, University of Idaho}

When It Comes to Origins Science, Is PNAS Really “Ready When You Are”?

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 31, 2019

Scientific Freedom

6}

Kevin Williamson imagines that scientists are free to “slug it out” in journals and other academic settings, so that the truth reliably emerges. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 25, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom, conservatism, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian theory, emotions, homework, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, Michael Behe, National Review, Nature (journal), novelty, PNAS, Science (journal), Scott Minnich, University of Idaho, William F. Buckley Jr.}

Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves — When You’re Ready to Think for Yourself

_{David Klinghoffer
January 25, 2019

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

The idea that scientists are like tribal elders, to be respected and never questioned, much less smirked at (God forbid), is one possible perspective. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 23, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Annie Hall, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, Marshall McLuhan}

Michael Behe’s Marshall McLuhan Moment

_{David Klinghoffer
January 23, 2019

Intelligent Design

1}

It's like the scene from Annie Hall with Kevin Williamson as the pretentious moviegoer in line with Woody Allen. Don’t know what I’m talking about? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
January 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, biologists, C.S. Lewis, conservatives, Criticism, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, David Klinghoffer, evolution, intelligent design, invisible, James A. Shapiro, Jerry Coyne, John Milton, Kevin Williamson, logic, National Review, poetry, T.S. Eliot}

On Intelligent Design, Do Your Own Homework. Make Up Your Own Mind.

_{Michael Behe
January 23, 2019

Evolution

5}

C.S. Lewis encountered an objection to his literary criticism analogous to Kevin Williamson’s and explored its underlying logic. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
January 22, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Human Exceptionalism
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, "God of the gaps", Darwinian theory, David Klinghoffer, debate, Douglas Axe, human life, ideology, intelligent design, Journal of Molecular Biology, Kevin Williamson, lawyers, Michael Behe, natural selection, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Research, science, Stephen Meyer, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Stifling the Intelligent Design Debate Is Bad Science

_{Wesley J. Smith
January 22, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Human Exceptionalism, Science Reporting

2}

Kevin Williamson deploys an absurd reductionist construct of the ID field as consisting of ideological assertions by “lawyers” and “amateurs.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 22, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, Cambrian Explosion, complexity, Darwinism, fact-checking, Gerd Müller, incorrigibility, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, National Review, Neo-Darwinism, novelty, peer-reviewed, peer-reviewed literature, University of Vienna}

Self-Induced Blindness: Round 3 with Kevin Williamson

_{David Klinghoffer
January 22, 2019

Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

3}

Of course, an allergy to conceding error is not unique to ID opponents, but it is typical of them. Read More ›