Tag: Skeptical Inquirer

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
July 2, 2024

Categories
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, astrology, atheism, Christof Koch, creationism, David Chalmers, evidence, homeopathy, intelligent design, Massimo Pigliucci, parapsychology, philosophers, pseudoscience, Skeptical Inquirer, UFOs}

What Is Pseudoscience? A Philosopher Tries to Figure It Out

_{Denyse O’Leary
July 2, 2024

Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

5}

One is tempted to wonder whether “room for disagreement” is a polite term for Not Yet Cancelled. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 28, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, algorithmic information theory, arrow, Cambridge University Press, coin toss, complexity, complexity theory, Darwinists, dissertation, evolution, fair coin, Francis Crick, Guide to Reading Jason Rosenhouse (series), intelligent design, Jason Rosenhouse, John Maynard Smith, Leo Kadanoff, Leslie Orgel, natural selection, Paul Davies, Philosophia Christi, poker, probabilistic complexity, probability, Richard Dawkins, Robert J. Marks II, royal flush, Skeptical Inquirer, specification, specified complexity, target, The Blind Watchmaker, The Design Inference, The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism, UC Irvine, University of Notre Dame, Wikipedia, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Jason Rosenhouse and Specified Complexity

_{William A. Dembski
June 28, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design

16}

Not all patterns eliminate chance in the presence of improbability. Take an arrow shot at a target. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
June 3, 2022

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, amino acids, Aquinas’ Fifth Way, atheism, Berra's Blunder, Cambridge University Press, coin toss, complex and specified information, creation myth, Darwinists, DNA, evolution, intelligence, intelligent agency, intelligent design, Jason Rosenhouse, life, natural selection, nature, proteins, Skeptical Inquirer, The Failures of Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism, Thomas Aquinas}

Rosenhouse’s Blunder: Another Nonsensical Mathematical Argument Against Intelligent Design

_{Michael Egnor
June 3, 2022

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

Darwinist mathematician Jason Rosenhouse uses the analogy of a coin toss to defend the Darwinian explanation. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
June 11, 2018

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", Case Western Reserve University, Charles Darwin, climate change, Darwinian evolution, David Klinghoffer, Gregor Mendel, Human Errors, Ian Tattersall, intelligent design, James Shapiro, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Jonathan Wells, Michael Egnor, Nathan Lents, Paul Nelson, peer review, psychologist, Psychology Today, Skeptical Inquirer, stereotype}

Why Argue with Intelligent Design? Offer Drive-By Psychotherapy Instead!

_{Denyse O’Leary
June 11, 2018

Biology, Intelligent Design

7}

Avoiding serious discussion of design in nature (and of many other questions) fills a need. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
January 19, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, "God of the gaps", academic freedom, Alabama, blood clotting, creationism, education, fossil record, Glenn Branch, intelligent design, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Of Pandas and People, public education, Ross Pomeroy, Science Education Policy, Skeptical Inquirer, Stephen Meyer, tiktaalik}

Of Pandas and Poor Journalism

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 19, 2018

Intelligent Design, Science Education

6}

Discovery, wonder, learning, exploration: That’s what we want young people to experience in science class. Read More ›