
natural philosophy


Tutorial: Melissa Cain Travis on Kepler and Cosmic Comprehensibility

“No Astronomical Investigations of Importance” in the Middle Ages? Not True!

Note to Thomists: The Ear Is a Reverse Piano

Intelligent Design Is Older Than You Think — A Lot Older

Cosmos Scrubs Religion’s Positive Influence from the History of the Scientific Revolution

New Book Sheds Light on the “Dark Age”: The Religion vs. Science Myth Exposed

Who Misrepresented Who? A Response to John Farrell

Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Jeffrey Shallit
Materialist mathematician Jeffrey Shallit has a post on an article in the Globe and Mail about philosophy and the immateriality of the mind. Shallit’s post is titled “Another Reason to Doubt the Relevance of Philosophy”. Shallit doesn’t think much of philosophy: If philosophers think the view that “The brain is not an organ of consciousness. … The brain has no cognitive powers at all” deserves anything more than a good horselaugh, this simply shows how irrelevant philosophy has become … Our future understanding of cognition will come from neuroscience, not from Wittgenstein. Philosophy is plainly irrelevant to Shallit, which is the problem. Wittgenstein may not inform Dr. Shallit’s understanding of cognition, but Descartes, Kant, Hume, James, Skinner, Block, the Churchlands, Read More ›






































