Tag: debates

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
August 31, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, chemists, debates, English, evolution, faith and science, Grzegorz Malec, intelligent design, philosophers of science, Poland, Polish, secularization, teleology, Warsaw, Wojchiech Sady}

Postcard from Warsaw: Debating Teleology in Science

_{William A. Dembski
August 31, 2025

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

An English version of the debate, with Professor Sady's words translated into English, is now available on YouTube. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
February 21, 2025

Categories
Bioethics
Faith & Science
Tagged
, American Humanist Association, C.S. Lewis, Daniel Dennett, Darwin's Dangerous Idea, debates, Denis Noble, Denyse O'Leary, Francis Collins, Francis Crick, intelligent design, James Shapiro, Mendelian genetics, Michael Egnor, Miracles (book), MIT, Old Testament, qualia, Richard Dawkins, Roger Penrose, Rudder Theatre, Santa Fe, Simon Conway Morris, Stephen Jay Gould, Steven Pinker, Steven Weinberg, Stuart Kauffman, Texas A&M University, The Better Angels of Our Nature, The Blind Watchmaker, Trotter Prize, Tufts University, violence, Zeitgeist}

Dawkins and Picard Win This Year’s Trotter Prize

_{William A. Dembski
February 21, 2025

Bioethics, Faith & Science

30}

A reflection on the 2025 Trotter Prize Lecture delivered by Oxford's Richard Dawkins and MIT's Rosalind Picard. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
June 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Candida, centromere, chromosome, Dan Stern Cardinale, David Klinghoffer, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, Drosophila, kinetochore, yeast}

Documentation for Dr. Dan

_{Science and Culture
June 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

We hope Rutgers biologist Dan Stern Cardinale finds these citations of interest. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 21, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, evolution, Evolution News, function, geologists, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, kinetochore, Long Story Short, Richard Sternberg, Rutgers University, Twitter}

Dr. Dan Has a Taste for Debate

_{David Klinghoffer
June 21, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

From what I’ve been told, there are many examples of “non-conserved” regions having sequence-independent functions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
June 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, evolution, function, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, podcast, Rutgers University}

Casey Luskin Reflects on His Recent Junk DNA Debate

_{Andrew McDiarmid
June 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

For decades we were told that non-coding regions of our DNA are littered with evolutionary junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Discovery Institute, DNA, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, ERVs, Evolution News, Ewan Birney, function, genome, junk DNA, Nature (journal), pseudogenes, repetitive DNA, RNA, Rutgers University, YouTube channels}

Did Dr. Dan Make Us Change Our Position on Junk DNA?

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

This claim is totally false and it perhaps reflects Dr. Dan’s wish to find a positive spin on the substance of what happened during the debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, cell types, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, evolution, function, genome, Hox genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, lncRNAs, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, non-coding DNA, non-coding RNAs, Paulo Amaral, Richard Sternberg, RNA, Rutgers University, scientific literature, The NonSequitur Show}

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 13, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, dog, Dr. Dan, embryogenesis, embryonic stem cells, enzymes, euchromatin, evolution, function, genome, Genome Biology, humans, intelligent design, junk DNA, LINE-1 elements, macaque, methylation, miRNAs, mouse, Nature (journal), non-coding RNAs, peer-reviewed literature, repetitive elements, Rutgers University, Science (journal), transposable elements}

From the “Junk DNA” Files: Can “Degraded” LINE Elements Still Be Functional?

_{Jonathan McLatchie, Richard Sternberg, and Casey Luskin
May 13, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

22}

On May 2, Casey Luskin had an online debate with Professor Daniel Stern Cardinale, an evolutionary biologist at Rutgers University. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 3, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, agnostics, biologists, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evidence, evolution, evolutionists, functionality, geologists, human genome, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, mainstream scientists, Paulo Amaral, Rutgers University, scientists, YouTube channels}

Casey Luskin Versus Dan Stern Cardinale: A Wonderful Debate About “Junk DNA”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 3, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Everyone did a great job, and the conversation was science-packed from beginning to end. Not one word of invective, and indeed highly cordial. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 2, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evolution, evolutionists, function, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, peer-reviewed literature, Rutgers University, technical literature}

“Junk DNA” from Three Perspectives: Some Key Quotes

_{Casey Luskin
May 2, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

19}

Many of these quotes are from mainstream scientific papers, books, or book chapters of a technical nature. Read More ›