
honesty


Dan Stern Cardinale: Comparative Biology, Invincible Ignorance

Atheist Philosopher Explains Why Intelligent Design Is Not a “God of the Gaps” Argument

Mendel’s Peas and More: Inferring Data Falsification in Science

Science Is Self-Correcting? Time for a Reality Check

Is There a Boom in Research Dishonesty?

Awesome Recovery for Atheist Lawrence Krauss

Theistic Evolution and the Moral High Ground

How a Scientific Field Can Collapse: The Case of Psychiatry

Will Robert Pennock Become the Next Michael Ruse?
If you’ll give me the Mic, I won’t Rob much of your time while Penning this short Ruse. In the Dover trial, Robert Pennock is the Plaintiffs’ expert on the philosophy of science, and Pennock pushed hard for a definition of science which is essentially “methodological naturalism.” This is eerily similar to the 1982 case, McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F.Supp. 1255 (E.D. Ark) over the teaching of young earth creationism, where Darwinist Philosopher of Science Michael Ruse testified that science was defined as follows: Ruse’s definition incorporates the precise methodological naturalism advocated by Pennock in Ruse’s requirements (1) and (2). Ruse’s definition was also subsequently accepted by Judge Overton and etched into Eastern Arkansas law. But we Read More ›





































