Tag: Creation Myths

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 24, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, 1 percent myth, Casey Luskin, chimpanzees, common ancestor, common ancestry, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, DNA, Erika DeBenedictis, evolution, gap divergence, genetic similarity, gibbon, Gone with the Wind, gorillas, Gutsick Gibbon, human origins, humans, intelligent design, National Museum of Natural History, Nature (journal), Plato's Revenge, Richard Sternberg, Smithsonian Institution, Trump Administration, YouTube videos}

As Luskin Debunks 1 Percent Myth, Evolutionists Fire Wildly in Response

_{David Klinghoffer
July 24, 2025

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology, Intelligent Design

4}

The myth matters because a toxic lie being advanced in our culture denies the exceptional status of human beings in nature. Many evils follow from that denial. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
May 12, 2025

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, bacterial flagellum, bats, biology, comparative biology, complex functional systems, Cornelius Hunter, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinism, DNA, evolution, Evolution News, gene duplications, Google Scholar, honesty, horizontal gene transfer, intelligent design, J.B.S. Haldane, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, mutations, National Geographic, natural selection, Nature Chemical Biology, Potemkin village, random variation, recombination, Richard Dawkins, Rutgers University, Theodosius Dobzhansky, whales}

Dan Stern Cardinale: Comparative Biology, Invincible Ignorance

_{Michael Behe
May 12, 2025

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

16}

Stern Cardinale loses it at the point where I note that Darwin-boosters go mute when asked how complex traits evolve (such as, say, those of bats or whales). Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Discovery Institute, DNA, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, ERVs, Evolution News, Ewan Birney, function, genome, junk DNA, Nature (journal), pseudogenes, repetitive DNA, RNA, Rutgers University, YouTube channels}

Did Dr. Dan Make Us Change Our Position on Junk DNA?

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

This claim is totally false and it perhaps reflects Dr. Dan’s wish to find a positive spin on the substance of what happened during the debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, cell types, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, evolution, function, genome, Hox genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, lncRNAs, Nature Biotechnology, Nature Methods, non-coding DNA, non-coding RNAs, Paulo Amaral, Richard Sternberg, RNA, Rutgers University, scientific literature, The NonSequitur Show}

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 3, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, agnostics, biologists, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evidence, evolution, evolutionists, functionality, geologists, human genome, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, mainstream scientists, Paulo Amaral, Rutgers University, scientists, YouTube channels}

Casey Luskin Versus Dan Stern Cardinale: A Wonderful Debate About “Junk DNA”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 3, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Everyone did a great job, and the conversation was science-packed from beginning to end. Not one word of invective, and indeed highly cordial. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 1, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debate, Discovery Institute, evolution, genome, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, misrepresentation, Rutgers University, The Codes of Life, The NonSequitur Show, YouTubers}

Debate: Casey Luskin Versus Rutgers Biologist Dan Cardinale, Thursday, May 2

_{David Klinghoffer
May 1, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Okay, this should be interesting. The question up for discussion: "Is the Human Genome Largely Junk DNA?" Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
March 29, 2024

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, American Scientist, biologists, Creation Myths, Dan Graur, Dan Stern Cardinale, DNA, ENCODE, evolution, Ewan Birney, functionality, genome, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, junk RNA, Laurence Moran, Long Story Short, Nature (journal), repetitive DNA, Richard Dawkins, Rutgers University, species, transposable elements, YouTubers}

“Creation Myths” Misquotes and Misrepresents Junk DNA Video

_{Casey Luskin
March 29, 2024

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design

20}

Our video backs up what it says with clear quotes and references. We’ve provided more documentation here. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
April 26, 2022

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biological information, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, cells, Creation Myths, DNA, Douglas Axe, E. coli, evolution, information, intelligent design, lac operon, novelty, polymerase, proteins, RNA, Stephen Meyer, undirected process, YouTube videos}

Unraveling the Myth that Undesigned Processes Generate Novel Functions

_{Brian Miller
April 26, 2022

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

In short, the sequences performed no new function, so no new information was created. Read More ›