Tag: sexism

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
March 4, 2025

Categories
Bioethics
Human Exceptionalism
Neuroscience & Mind
Psychology
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, animals, Aristotle, behavior, Dogs, emotions, evolutionary biologists, feelings, humans, Marc Bekoff, Michael Egnor, moral choice, prejudice, Psychology Today, Racism, sensations, sexism, speciesism, The Immortal Mind, Thomas Aquinas, Wesley J. Smith}

Clinical Psychologist Supports Human Exceptionalism

_{Denyse O’Leary
March 4, 2025

Bioethics, Human Exceptionalism, Neuroscience & Mind, Psychology, Scientific Reasoning

6}

Gregg Henriques, a secular humanist, has developed an approach that accepts human exceptionalism without denying that animals have mental abilities. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
December 10, 2024

Categories
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, Big Think, Dartmouth College, free will, John Horgan, Marcello Gleiser, Michael Egnor, militarism, Mind Matters, Minding the Brain, proofs, quantum mechanics, Racism, sexism, Superdeterminism, The Immortal Mind}

Can There Be Evidence for Free Will?

_{Denyse O’Leary
December 10, 2024

Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

6}

John Horgan thinks that “proofs” of free will seem as dubious as denials but there is actually considerable neuroscience evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O’Leary

Date
July 10, 2023

Categories
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Paleontology
Tagged
, ancestors, archeology, cave art, Czech Republic, David Coppedge, Howard University, human origins, humans, intelligence, Neanderthals, Racism, ravens, sexism, UNESCO, University of Tübingen, whiteness}

Our Ancestors Are Evolving, Just to Keep Up!

_{Denyse O’Leary
July 10, 2023

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology, Paleontology

4}

Negative biases about our forebears have long been part of science, education, and popular culture. Why? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Nancy Pearcey

Date
June 14, 2023

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Tagged
, anthropologists, birth, Charles Darwin, Darwinism, feelings, Herbert Spencer, intelligence, intuition, males, Nancy Pearcey, natural selection, nurturing, sexism, The Toxic War on Masculinity, women}

Darwin: Why Women Are Inferior

_{Nancy Pearcey
June 14, 2023

Bioethics, Evolution

4}

Any list of toxic male behavior includes disrespect for women, and Darwin bears some responsibility for that. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 12, 2023

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Voice in the Wilderness, abolitionist movement, Adrian Desmond, African Americans, Africans, anti-racism, biologists, Charles Darwin, Darwin’s Sacred Cause, Donald Trump, Eric Wallace, Eugenie Scott, evolution, Freedom’s Journal Institute, Human Zoos, intelligent design, James Moore, John West, Joseph L. Graves Jr., Joseph Stalin, Olufemi Oluniyi, racial hierarchy, Racism, racists, Robert Shedinger, Royal Society, sexism, The Descent of Man}

Yet Another Scholar Seeks to Airbrush Darwin’s Racist Legacy

_{David Klinghoffer
May 12, 2023

Bioethics, Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

Racists for decades, down to today, have looked to Charles Darwin as a champion of their ideas, and if they’re right about anything, it’s that. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 13, 2020

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, atheism, Black Lives Matter, corruption, COVID-19, decency, Dennis Prager, Discovery Institute, Eric Metaxas, free speech, goodness, honesty, honor, J. Robert Oppenheimer, Jeffrey Epstein, Lawrence Krauss, Michael Egnor, Racism, scientists, sexism, skunks, Stephen Meyer, Toronto, Wall Street Journal}

Awesome Recovery for Atheist Lawrence Krauss

_{David Klinghoffer
July 13, 2020

Physical Sciences

5}

Krauss of all people is now lecturing us about the importance of…decency, goodness, honesty, honor, and purity. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
December 19, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, “consensus science”, evidence, Google, groupthink, intelligent design, James Damore, Politics, progress, scientists, sexism, Super Bowl, University of Arizona}

Second Thought About the Idea of “Consensus”

_{Sarah Chaffee
December 19, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science

3}

Sometimes scientists do not, in fact, follow the evidence. The consensus, then, could be wrong. Read More ›