file-drawer Type post Author David Coppedge Date May 29, 2025 CategoriesEthicsMetascienceScience Reporting Tagged , accuracy, artificial intelligence, data, data science, evidence, Evolution News, fakery, fallibility, file drawer problem, fraud, generative ai, integrity, knowledge, Leipzig, Nature (journal), objectivity, peer review, PLOS ONE, PNAS, politicization, post-trust, predatory journals, pseudoscience, public trust, replicability, scientific reliability, scientists, suppressed evidence, The Conversation, transparency How the “Scientific Community” Undermines Its Own Trustworthiness David Coppedge May 29, 2025 Ethics, Metascience, Science Reporting 10 The “file drawer problem” leads invariably to biased reporting. It refers to scientists deciding not to report negative results. Read More ›
Type post Author Douglas Axe Date June 15, 2016 CategoriesMedicineScience Education Tagged , __tedited, dissenters, information, laymen, public opinion, public trust, scientism, trust in scientists, Undeniable (book), Vaccines Public Opinion Is the Ultimate Peer Review Douglas Axe June 15, 2016 Medicine, Science Education 4 People aren't stupid. Science is a public enterprise, and public acceptance has always been its most significant seal of approval. Read More ›
