wikipedia button Type post Date October 27, 2025 CategoriesComputational SciencesIntelligent Design Tagged , bias, chatbots, Donald Trump, editors, Elon Musk, generative ai, Gizmodo, intelligent design, Larry Sanger, nonprofit organizations, search engines, Wikipedia Cry Us a River: AI Chatbots May Be Killing Wikipedia Science & Culture October 27, 2025 Computational Sciences, Intelligent Design 3 It’s not clear how this will impact a commonly heard criticism of Wikipedia — bias, very much including the subject of intelligent design. Read More ›
file-drawer Type post Author David Coppedge Date May 29, 2025 CategoriesEthicsMetascienceScience Reporting Tagged , accuracy, artificial intelligence, data, data science, evidence, Evolution News, fakery, fallibility, file drawer problem, fraud, generative ai, integrity, knowledge, Leipzig, Nature (journal), objectivity, peer review, PLOS ONE, PNAS, politicization, post-trust, predatory journals, pseudoscience, public trust, replicability, scientific reliability, scientists, suppressed evidence, The Conversation, transparency How the “Scientific Community” Undermines Its Own Trustworthiness David Coppedge May 29, 2025 Ethics, Metascience, Science Reporting 10 The “file drawer problem” leads invariably to biased reporting. It refers to scientists deciding not to report negative results. Read More ›
