Tag: critics | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 7, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, Charles Marshall, critics, Evolution News, evolutionary icons, filmmaker, intelligent design, Jackson Wheat, Jeremy England, Jonathan Wells, Long Story Short, music, Nota Bene, PZ Myers, whales, YouTube videos, Zombie Science (book)}

Whale Song: Learning from Our Critics

_{David Klinghoffer
July 7, 2020

Biology, Evolution

4}

A substantive argument is a lovely thing to behold, to watch or to listen to, even if punctuated (in Myers's case) by the usual grumpy insults. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 2, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, animation, bears, Charles Darwin, critics, Evolution News, Jonathan Wells, Long Story Short, Nota Bene, video, whales, Zombie Science (book)}

Walking Whales: Get a Free Chapter of Zombie Science

_{David Klinghoffer
July 2, 2020

Evolution

2}

The origin of whales has remained a sore point for evolutionists, on which they’ve tried to perform a miraculous transformation. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
July 1, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Linguistics
Tagged
, amino acids, biological information, critics, DNA, evolutionary processes, genetic code, information theory, Macbeth, physicists, proteins, Randy Isaac, RNA, Scrabble, semantic information, Shannon information, Stephen Meyer, William Shakespeare}

Mistakes Our Critics Make: Information Theory

_{Brian Miller
July 1, 2020

Intelligent Design, Linguistics

6}

Researchers felt compelled to describe biological information using such phrases as “coding schemes,” “carries meaning,” “core program,” and “hierarchical rules (grammar).” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 1, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, critics, Darwinists, evolution, evolutionary transitions, fossil record, Geppetto, homology, Jackson Wheat, Jonathan Wells, Long Story Short, Pinocchio, PZ Myers, Walt Disney Studios, whales, Zombie Science (book)}

Unwary Darwinists Swallowed Whole by Seemingly Unthreatening Whale Video

_{David Klinghoffer
July 1, 2020

Biology, Evolution

3}

The lighthearted animation from Discovery Institute topples a Darwinist icon. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
June 21, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Center for Science and Culture, critics, evolution, intelligent design, Intelligent Design YouTube Festival, movie producers, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer}

Signature in the Cell: Stephen Meyer Faces His Critics

_{Science and Culture
June 21, 2020

Intelligent Design

2}

Here is video #6. In addition to producing documentaries and animations, we also post lectures by our scientists and scholars. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 18, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, automobiles, chance, chassis, critics, design, design detection, doors, explanatory filter, intelligent design, necessity, probability, repudiation, retirement, S. Joshua Swamidass, Sean McDowell, Uncommon Descent}

Chance, Necessity, and Design

_{William A. Dembski
June 18, 2020

Intelligent Design

2}

To properly use the Explanatory Filter, it is vital to identify what exactly one is trying to explain. Take a rusted automobile. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 16, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Conservation of Information, critics, Douglas Axe, evolution, explanatory filter, No Free Lunch, retirement, Robert J. Marks II, S. Joshua Swamidass, Sean McDowell, specified complexity, The Design Inference, The Design Revolution, Winston Ewert}

Retirement ≠ Repudiation

_{William A. Dembski
June 16, 2020

Intelligent Design

3}

My position here hasn’t changed. I’ve beefed up specified complexity and developed it further over the years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
June 3, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Center for Science and Culture, critics, Dallas Conference on Science & Faith, Daniel Reeves, detective, Discovery Institute, education, Forensics, ID the Future, intelligent design, podcast, straw man, students}

Reeves: Getting Intelligent Design Wrong, and Getting It Right

_{Science and Culture
June 3, 2020

Intelligent Design

1}

Daniel Reeves explains what ID really is — it's not unlike detective work — and the central question ID seeks to answer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 15, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, birds, critics, Dallas Conference on Science & Faith, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwin's Finches, Darwinian evolution, dog breeds, Dogs, eukaryotes, exaggeration, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, fitness, genetic information, humans, humor, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, mammals, mutations, polar bears, prokaryotes, religion, Richard Lenski, science, wolves}

Judge Michael Behe’s Case for Intelligent Design Yourself

_{David Klinghoffer
April 15, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

“Darwin’s mechanism is dominated by ‘Poison-Pill’ mutations: positively-selected, loss-of-function mutation.” It “squanders genetic information for short-term gain.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 25, 2019

Categories
Neuroscience & Mind
Philosophy
Tagged
, __edited, abstract thought, brain, critics, materialism, Michael Egnor, mind, Mind Matters, nature, Neil deGrasse Tyson, neuroscience, Plato, science, Science Uprising, Stony Brook University, truth}

Science Uprising — Michael Egnor Responds to a (Thoughtful) Critic

_{David Klinghoffer
June 25, 2019

Neuroscience & Mind, Philosophy

3}

“Although higher thought is not localizable to one region of the brain, it may be distributed to neurons throughout the brain.” Read More ›