Tag: critics | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 5, 2021

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, critics, Darwinists, evolution, intelligent design, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, Sean McDowell}

Sean McDowell, Michael Behe: Facing ID’s Critics

_{David Klinghoffer
January 5, 2021

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

This Thursday, January 7, in a live presentation at 1 pm Pacific time, they ask, “Is Intelligent Design Defensible?” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 18, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Adam and Eve, atheism, biologists, chloroquine, Columbia University, critics, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, Evangelical Christians, evolutionists, friendship, intelligent design, Justin Brierley, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, mutations, Nathan Lents, op-ed, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal)}

The Myth of Behe “Refuted”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 18, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Once again, Darwinists seek to avoid an argument by using clever talk, giving the false impression of a scientist, Behe, who brushes away challenges. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 8, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, blogs, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinism, Discovery Institute Press, journals, Michael Behe, natural selection, newspapers, random mutation, The Edge of Evolution, University of Georgia}

“Compelling,” “Thorough”: Biochemist Russell Carlson on Behe’s Mousetrap

_{David Klinghoffer
December 8, 2020

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

"Over the years Behe has received a mountain of criticism, all of which has been answered by him in letters to the editors of journals, newspapers, and blogs." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 4, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological origins, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinism, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Ray Bohlin}

Biologist Raymond Bohlin on Behe’s Mousetrap: “This Collection Is a Treasure”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 4, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Says biologist Raymond Bohlin, the book is a "gift to anyone passionately interested in biological origins and the debate over Darwinism and design." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 30, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, articles, bacterial flagellum, biological systems, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian mechanism, evidence, Finland, Heretic: One Scientist’s Journey from Darwin to Design, Irreducible Complexity, Matti Leisola, Michael Behe}

Matti Leisola: Michael Behe “Opened My Eyes”

_{David Klinghoffer
November 30, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

To say that a writer "opened your eyes," and to something as profound as the design of life, is a fantastic tribute. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 28, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biologists, critics, data, Eric Anderson, evolution, ID the Future, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, molecular machines, Science (journal)}

Podcast with Michael Behe: “You Can’t Deny the Data Forever”

_{Science & Culture
November 28, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The Lehigh University biochemist addresses misconceptions about irreducible complexity, and responds to the claim that “molecular machines” is a misnomer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 23, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, books, critics, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian theory, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Kenneth Miller, Larry Moran, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nature’s Destiny, Neo-Darwinism, Richard Lenski, University of Otago, worldview}

Praise for Behe’s Latest: “Facts Before Theory”

_{David Klinghoffer
November 23, 2020

Biology, Evolution

2}

Says Michael Denton, "The book represents a devastatingly brilliant unanswerable response to his Darwinian critics and to the whole Darwinian worldview." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 20, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological origins, critics, Darwinian mechanism, Darwinism, evidence, intelligent design, Kenneth Miller, Lehigh University, life, Michael Behe, Nature (journal), Paul Gross, Science (journal), Sean Carroll, The Edge of Evolution, The New Criterion, webinar}

Does Behe Ignore Critics? Find Out in a Live Webinar Saturday

_{David Klinghoffer
November 20, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

One of the weirdly persistent themes in attacks on him by other biologists is that he "waves away" opposing interpretations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 18, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, critics, evolution, ID the Future, intelligent design, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, New York Times, science journals}

Behe’s Latest Gives the Lie to Critics’ Accusation

_{Science & Culture
November 18, 2020

Biochemistry, Intelligent Design

1}

Michael Behe's pro-Darwin critics have jumped all over him. Some even claim he’s ignored their objections. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 17, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Brazilian Academy of Sciences, critics, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian evolution, Darwinism, intelligent design, Marcos Eberlin, scientists, The Edge of Evolution}

Tomorrow: Behe Springs a Mousetrap on Darwin

_{David Klinghoffer
November 17, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Biochemist Michael Behe has been conducting a decades-long independent scientific audit of the evidence for unguided Darwinian evolution. Read More ›