Tag: The Design Revolution

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
December 20, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Legal Science (jurisprudence)
Tagged
, American Civil Liberties Union, bacterial flagellum, Casey Luskin, Darwin Strikes Back, Darwin’s Black Box, Design Inference, evolution, intelligent agents, intelligent design, irreducibly complex systems, Judge John E. Jones, Kevin Padian, Kitzmiller v. Dover, Michael Behe, molecular machines, Of Pandas and People, Pennsylvania, philosophy, Scott Minnich, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, supernatural, Ten Myths About Dover, textbooks, The Design Revolution, theology, Thomas Woodward, William Dembski}

Ten Myths About Dover: No. 1, “Jones Judged Actual ID Theory, Not a Straw Man”

_{Sarah Chaffee
December 20, 2025

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Legal Science (jurisprudence)

13}

At the end of the day, the ruling by Judge Jones really is not a refutation of intelligent design at all. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Coppedge

Date
April 22, 2022

Categories
Biology
Engineering
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, Current Biology, Dan-Eric Nilsson, Darwinian theory, David Berlinski, Doubts About Darwin, evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, light-sensitive spot, Neil Thomas, photoreceptors, retina, Richard Dawkins, The Design Revolution, Thomas Woodward, vertebrate eye}

Darwinists Seek to Explain the Eye’s Engineering Perfection

_{David Coppedge
April 22, 2022

Biology, Engineering, Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

First, they turn evolution into an engineer. Personification is a common ploy by Darwinists. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Eric Cassell

Date
December 16, 2021

Categories
Botany
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, "poor design", adaptation, animals, behavior, biosphere, blind evolution, brown bears, Charles Darwin, convergence, dysteleology, evolution, homology, intelligent design, junk DNA, Life Sciences, microevolution, polar bears, Systems Biology, The Design Revolution, vestigial structures, William A. Dembski, William Paley}

Complex Programmed Behaviors — Intelligently Designed

_{Eric Cassell
December 16, 2021

Botany, Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

Some discriminators don’t get us very far in deciding which is the better explanation between blind evolution and intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 22, 2021

Categories
Biology
Cosmology
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, Big Bang, BioLogos Foundation, faith, ID the Future, intelligent causes, intelligent design, Jay Richards, MIT Press, National Academy of Sciences, Nature, Phillip E. Johnson, podcast, Science, Stephen Meyer, The Conversation, The Design Revolution, theology, Thomas Woodward, William A. Dembski}

Answering Another Objection to Intelligent Design: “You Can’t Prove God Exists”

_{Casey Luskin
February 22, 2021

Biology, Cosmology, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Philosophy of Science

10}

Now it’s possible that physics-based arguments for design could extend the argument further than you can go within biological design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 17, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, design detection, Douglas Axe, evolution, intelligent design, Peaceful Science, S. Joshua Swamidass, Sean McDowell, The Design Revolution}

Postscript on the Explanatory Filter

_{William A. Dembski
June 17, 2020

Intelligent Design

1}

Josh Swamidass wants to revisit some well worn paths. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 16, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Conservation of Information, critics, Douglas Axe, evolution, explanatory filter, No Free Lunch, Robert J. Marks II, S. Joshua Swamidass, Sean McDowell, specified complexity, The Design Inference, The Design Revolution, Winston Ewert}

Retirement ≠ Repudiation

_{William A. Dembski
June 16, 2020

Intelligent Design

3}

My position here hasn’t changed. I’ve beefed up specified complexity and developed it further over the years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 27, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BioEssays, biologists, censorship, complex and specified information, CSI, Dave Speijer, Discovering Intelligent Design, Europeans, Evolution News, Federal Government, government, intelligence, intelligent design, Kevin Laland, Le Centre national de la recherche scientifique, males, Michael Behe, Neo-Darwinism, Royal Society, sex, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, The Design Revolution, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, William A. Dembski}

Scientist Admits Biologists Are Obsessed with Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
May 27, 2020

Intelligent Design

12}

What do scientists spend more time thinking about — sex, or the theory of intelligent design? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 13, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, bacteria, bioengineering, Charles Darwin, Charles Thaxton, corn, Craig Venter, CRISPR-Cas9, design filter, Design Inference, DNA, Dogs, Douglas Axe, Galápagos Islands, genotype, intelligent design, maize, Mars rover, natural, Nature (journal), No Free Lunch, Paul Nelson, phenotype, Roger Olsen, Technion, The Design Revolution, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Walter Bradley, William A. Dembski, wolves}

Blurring the Line Between Natural and Artificial

_{Science & Culture
March 13, 2020

Intelligent Design

9}

As technology mimics nature, at what point might future investigators be unsure about natural versus intelligent causes? Read More ›