Tag: Cambrian fossils

^{Type
post

Author
Emily Reeves

Date
March 10, 2026

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Life Sciences
Tagged
, animal embryos, Cambrian fossils, coelacanth, common ancestor, common ancestry, common characters, common descent, convergent evolution, Darwin's Finches, embryonic stage, environmental pressures, Ernst Haeckel, evolutionary predictions, Galápagos finches, geological time, ginkgo trees, horseshoe crabs, hummingbirds, Linnaeus, living fossils, Max Telford, molecular clock, morphology, Nautilus, nightjars, penguins, South Africa, stasis, swallows, swifts, The Tree of Life, The Tree of Life (book), Tree of Life, tuatara, University College London, Wollemi pine}

In Stories from Max Telford’s New Book, Failed Predictions of Common Descent

_{Emily Reeves
March 10, 2026

Biology, Evolution, Life Sciences

9}

Well-documented examples of organisms show remarkable stasis over hundreds of millions of years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Emily Reeves

Date
October 23, 2025

Categories
Biology
Paleontology
Tagged
, arthropods, bees, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian fossils, Cambrian Period, crustaceans, Darwin’s Doubt, dragonflies, fossil record, human vision, light, Nature (journal), paleontology, preservation, trilobites, vision}

Ancient Eyes, Modern Design: The Remarkable Vision of Trilobites

_{Emily Reeves
October 23, 2025

Biology, Paleontology

3}

Does this discovery suggest that the principles of compound vision emerged nearly half a billion years ago as the authors concluded? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
December 6, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Paleontology
Tagged
, algae, bilaterian animals, Cambrian fossils, cnidarians, Current Biology, Cyanobacteria, Ediacaran biota, falsification, Fossil Friday (series), fossils, Kimberella, molecular clock studies, motility, nematode, New Scientist, Precambrian, Professor Dave, roundworms, UC Riverside}

Fossil Friday: Are Ediacaran “Fishing Hooks” a Breakthrough Discovery of Precambrian Animals?

_{Günter Bechly
December 6, 2024

Evolution, Paleontology

12}

Let’s have a look at the newest edition of the Precambrian animal guessing game. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 23, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, animals, arthropods, bioRxiv, body plans, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian fossils, Cambrian News, Canada, carbon, Darwin's Doubt, Ediacaran fossils, evolution, fossil record, geochemistry, oxygen, PNAS, Stephen Meyer}

In Carbon Isotope Excursions, Darwinists Lose Another Excuse for the Cambrian Explosion

_{Science & Culture
July 23, 2020

Biology, Evolution

7}

The claim that a spike in carbon isotope concentrations led to the explosion of biological diversity in the Cambrian doesn’t hold up, as if it would have helped, anyway. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 20, 2020

Categories
Cosmology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Amazon, biologists, Cambrian fossils, China, Darwin's Dilemma, Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute, Discovery Institute Press, evolution, Evolution and Intelligent Design in a Nutshell, Illustra Media, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Kindle, marine biologists, paperback, Paul Chien, Stephen Meyer, Summer Seminars}

A Hot Seller from Discovery Institute Press, New Book Offers Intelligent Design “In a Nutshell”

_{Science & Culture
May 20, 2020

Cosmology, Intelligent Design

2}

The genesis of the slim and accessible Nutshell book was at a Discovery Institute Summer Seminar. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
June 12, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Philosophy of Science
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __tedited, agent causation, argument from analogy, Cambrian fossils, entropy, evolutionary biology, explanatory power, fossil record, gradualism, intelligent causation, methodological naturalism, scientific reasoning, The Origins of Life}

Why Should Evolutionary Biology Be So Different?

_{Granville Sewell
June 12, 2016

Evolution, Philosophy of Science, Scientific Reasoning

9}

Joseph LeConte, professor of geology at the University of California, provides an insight into the way most scientists think about evolution. Read More ›