Tag: understanding

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 8, 2026

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, children, Christianity, creator, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, divine image, existence, freeway, How the West Won, human beings, humanity, intelligent design, Interstate 5, James Watson, laws of nature, men, Nancy Pearcey, nature, progress, reason, religion, Rodney Stark, science and faith, scientific theories, Seattle, Seattleites, slavery, sociologists, understanding, Universal Life Church, universe, Western culture, women}

Science Isn’t God, but It Does Point to God

_{David Klinghoffer
June 8, 2026

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

4}

As you are driving on Interstate 5 just north of downtown Seattle, a home with purple floor-to-ceiling windows stands out prominently. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 27, 2026

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Physics
Tagged
, Brian Miller, Center for Science and Culture, church, compassion, contradictions, electrons, Elizabeth Urbanowicz, emotional intelligence, Energy, faith and science, general relativity, graduate students, light, Mass, quantum mechanics, Scripture, sensitivity, space, stars, students, Summer Seminar on Intelligent Design, tensions, undergraduates, understanding, Young Earth Creationism}

Brian Miller on Emotional Intelligence in Science, Scientific Tensions, and More

_{David Klinghoffer
March 27, 2026

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Physics

3}

The context is when students with a religious background enter the sciences at the undergraduate or graduate level. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen Dilley

Date
December 6, 2023

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, An Introduction to Systems Biology, beauty, biography, Brazil, Brian Miller, Charles Darwin, Discovery Institute, Emily Reeves, evolution, intelligent design, intelligibility, John Milton, natural selection, nature, Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, Summer Seminars on Intelligent Design, Systems Biology, Texas A&M, The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, understanding, Uri Alon, William Shakespeare, wonder}

Nature’s Wonder — A Tale of Two Scientists

_{Stephen Dilley
December 6, 2023

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Charles Darwin described an atrophied sensitivity to “grandeur” that he noted in himself. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
November 9, 2023

Categories
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, Academy Award, Alan Turing, artificial intelligence, Chinese, Chinese Room, computers, human beings, human intelligence, John Searle, Ray Kurzweil, understanding}

Passing the Turing Test Is No Guarantee of True AI

_{Casey Luskin
November 9, 2023

Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

3}

A person who speaks no Chinese whatsoever inhabits a room full of file cabinets full of questions and answers — all written in Chinese. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Amanda Witt

Date
July 13, 2022

Categories
Faith & Science
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, algorithms, artificial intelligence, Baylor University, brain, computers, creativity, divine image, Elon Musk, emotion, heart, hormones, humans, humor, machines, mercy, neurons, Non-Computable You, programmers, qualia, religion, Robert J. Marks II, software, soul, Stephen Hawking, understanding}

The Difference Between Humans and Machines

_{Amanda Witt
July 13, 2022

Faith & Science, Neuroscience & Mind

6}

Why do news headlines continually suggest that AI is practically human already, and soon will become fully human? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 6, 2022

Categories
Faith & Science
Human Exceptionalism
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, Alan Turing, algorithms, Baylor University, computation, computer science, computers, consciousness, creativity, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, emotion, faith, future, humans, immortality, intelligent design, machines, mathematician, Non-Computable You, qualia, Ray Kurzweil, Robert J. Marks II, sentience, Singularity, speed, spirituality, Turing Machine, understanding, William A. Dembski}

Marks: Non-Computable You Won’t Achieve Immortality Through an AI Machine

_{David Klinghoffer
July 6, 2022

Faith & Science, Human Exceptionalism, Neuroscience & Mind

2}

Dreams of achieving immortality by having your consciousness uploaded, merging man and computer in the predicted 2045 “Singularity,” are just that — dreams. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert J. Marks II

Date
June 24, 2022

Categories
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, "God of the gaps", algorithms, artificial intelligence, computers, consciousness, creativity, emergence, experience, human brain, immortality, mimicry, Non-Computable You, qualia, robots, sentience, understanding}

No Pony in the Manure, No Consciousness in the Code

_{Robert J. Marks II
June 24, 2022

Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

5}

These AI champions are appealing to the Software of the Gaps, a secular cousin of the God of the Gaps. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
April 22, 2021

Categories
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, artificial intelligence, computer science, deep learning, elephant, Erik Larson, human intelligence, Neural Networks, philosophers, programmers, The Myth of Artificial Intelligence, understanding, Wikipedia}

The Myth of “Deep Learning”

_{William A. Dembski
April 22, 2021

Neuroscience & Mind

2}

This is pathetic, and this is what is supposed to lay waste and supersede human intelligence? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 8, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, artificial intelligence, Baylor University, computers, consciousness, ID the Future, intelligent design, Introduction to Evolutionary Informatics, Robert Crowther, Robert J. Marks II, SpaceX, Tesla, understanding, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Elon Musk — Intelligent Design Proponent?

_{David Klinghoffer
January 8, 2018

Intelligent Design

1}

Admittedly, that may come as a surprise to Elon Musk, but I think Robert Marks defends the argument with a certain persuasive mischievousness. Read More ›