Tag: Response to Criticism | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
February 13, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, amino acids, Ann Gauger, bioengineering, cells, Darwin Devolves, enzyme, evolution, fairy tales, Heretic, histidine, Jonathan Witt, Matti Leisola, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, neo-Darwinian evolution, Neo-Darwinism, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Salmonella, Science (journal), tryptophan}

Cited to Attack Darwin Devolves, Study Devolves on Close Inspection

_{Science & Culture
February 13, 2019

Evolution

5}

Pointing out the review's many failings will be the work of multiple articles. Let’s start by zeroing in on just one segment. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
February 11, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, blood-clotting cascade, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Escherichia coli, Eugenie Scott, evolution, Francis Collins, fraud, Günter Bechly, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jerry Coyne, Karl Giberson, Kenneth Miller, malaria, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, Response to Criticism, Richard Dawkins, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Stephen Meyer, The Edge of Evolution, waiting-time problem, William A. Dembski}

Darwinists Devolve: Review by Swamidass, Lenski, and Lents Borders on Fraud

_{John G. West
February 11, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

9}

I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 7, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, devolution, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, intelligent design, John Jay College, Long Term Evolution Experiment, Nathan Lents, National Academy of Sciences, offspring, Peaceful Science, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Woo-hoo! In Science Review of Darwin Devolves, Lenski Has No Response to My Main Argument

_{Michael Behe
February 7, 2019

Biology, Evolution

3}

In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
October 27, 2016

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, absence of evidence, argument from ignorance, circular reasoning, Darwinian theory, evidence for id, experimental science, falsifiability, gradualism, Irreducible Complexity, Jerry Coyne, Kenneth Miller, logic, Michael Ruse, molecular biology, positive case for design, presuppositions, Response to Criticism, testability, theistic evolution}

Philosophical Objections to Intelligent Design: A Response to Critics

_{Michael Behe
October 27, 2016

Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science

38}

Some reviewers of Darwin's Black Box raised philosophical objections. I will discuss several of these. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Lee M. Spetner

Date
September 26, 2016

Categories
Scientific Reasoning
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __tedited, Lamarckian theory, Lee Spetner, macroevolution, microevolution, misrepresentation, Modern Synthesis, mutations, observations, probabilities, Response to Criticism, scientific method}

Gloves Off — Responding to David Levin on the Nonrandom Evolutionary Hypothesis

_{Lee M. Spetner
September 26, 2016

Scientific Reasoning, Scientific Trustworthiness

15}

A scientific theory cannot be established as valid unless the consequences that follow from it correspond to reality. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 2, 2016

Categories
Biochemistry
Faith & Science
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __tedited, apologetics, bias, BioLogos Foundation, code, complex specified information, Dennis Venema, disguised religion, empirical evidence, inference to the best explanation, ontogenetic information, Response to Criticism, straw man}

This Sounds Familiar: Theistic Evolutionist Recycles Anti-ID Argument Refuted Years Ago

_{Science & Culture
September 2, 2016

Biochemistry, Faith & Science, Scientific Reasoning

9}

Unless they've kept up with the debate, readers of Dr. Venema's latest for BioLogos might think ID advocates never thought of his objection. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
July 25, 2016

Categories
Botany
Evolution
Tagged
, __tedited, adaptation, alleles, Darwinian mechanisms, diploidal genome, haploid, Joe Felsenstein, misrepresentation, mutation rate, natural selection, naturalists, Nature, non-random mutation, population genetics, positive selection, random mutation, random processes, randomness, Response to Criticism, zoologists}

In Terror of Chipmunks: A Response to Joseph Felsenstein

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
July 25, 2016

Botany, Evolution

22}

Seldom have I seen a piece of scientifically inspired writing like Felsenstein's that is so far off the mark. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 24, 2016

Categories
Faith & Science
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __tedited, atheism, God Hypothesis, Jerry Coyne, Response to Criticism, scientific debate}

Fellow Atheist Dismayed at A.C. Grayling’s Debate Performance Versus Rabbi Rowe

_{David Klinghoffer
June 24, 2016

Faith & Science, Physical Sciences

3}

It must come as a disappointment that the young rabbi and former tank driver with the Israel Defense Force got the better of the distinguished philosopher. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 16, 2016

Categories
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __tedited, common descent, insults, Response to Criticism, S. Joshua Swamidass, scientific credibility, scientific debate, theistic evolution, trust in scientists}

Advice to a Theistic Evolutionist

_{David Klinghoffer
May 16, 2016

Scientific Reasoning

5}

Joshua Swamidass is a reputable scientist at Washington University, a passionate Christian speaking to other passionate Christians. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
March 21, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, ad hominem, Book News & Events, Darwin's Doubt, events, Meyer's Responses, Response to Criticism, rhetoric}

How Not to Debate — Lawrence Krauss in Toronto

_{Ann Gauger
March 21, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

When someone opens what should be a scholarly debate with name-calling, innuendo, and accusations of dishonesty, it's hard to respect that person. Read More ›