Tag: scientific debate

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
March 30, 2025

Categories
Bioethics
Medicine
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Bethesda (magazine), censorship, COVID-19, DOGE, Donald Trump, Francis Collins, hormone injections, hysteria, ideology, innovation, Jay Bhattacharya, layoffs, National Institutes of Health, PhD students, reform, research funding, respondents, scientific debate, scientists, Trump Administration}

Hysteria in the Science Sector Over DOGE

_{Wesley J. Smith
March 30, 2025

Bioethics, Medicine, Scientific Freedom

4}

Whatever problems now exist for the public medical research funding sector, the disappointing Francis Collins helped create them. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
February 18, 2025

Categories
Faith & Science
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, Bayesian reasoning, Big Bang, Bryan Callen, evidence, ID the Future, information, intelligent design, Michael Shermer, mind, nature, Return of the God Hypothesis, scientific debate, scientific investigation, Stephen Meyer, The Bryan Callen Show, universe}

Can Science Find God? Stephen Meyer vs. Michael Shermer

_{Andrew McDiarmid
February 18, 2025

Faith & Science, Physical Sciences

3}

Humans seem to be drawn in a certain direction toward truth and beauty. Is that an accident of nature? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 26, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Aryans, creationists, editors, Evolution News, Free Science, Humanize, intelligent design, Jews, Journal of Theoretical Biology, journals, medical ethics, Nature (journal), Nazi Germany, Richard Sternberg, Science (journal), scientific debate, scientific method, soft totalitarianism, Stephen Meyer, The New England Journal of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Wesley Smith, yellow star}

Ethicist Protests Politicized Science — Alas, That Horse Left the Barn Long Ago

_{David Klinghoffer
October 26, 2020

Scientific Freedom

4}

It is all about the costs of getting on the wrong side of the power structure. To say that this “chills” debate about scientific issues is an understatement. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 16, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Sociology
Tagged
, __nedited, 1984 (novel), anomalies, cynicism, dissent, elitism, exclusion, expertise, foxes, George Orwell, lions, Normal Science, Paul Nelson, Politics, post-truth, power and prestige, revolutionary science, Royal Society, scientific debate, Steve Fuller, The Guardian}

London Guardian Acknowledges the Irony of Excluding ID Advocates from the Royal Society Meeting

_{David Klinghoffer
December 16, 2016

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Sociology

4}

Sociologist Steve Fuller's theme is what he calls "post-truth." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 21, 2016

Categories
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __tedited, argument from authority, design intuition, feelings, logical fallacies, persuasion, public opinion, scientific debate, skepticism, tribalism, trust in scientists, Undeniable (book)}

Scientists Aren’t Exempt from Feelings, Any More Than the Public Is

_{David Klinghoffer
July 21, 2016

Scientific Reasoning

6}

And no, that's not entirely a bad thing. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 28, 2016

Categories
Faith & Science
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __tedited, ambiguity, equivocation, faith and reason, faith and science, respect, scientific debate, theistic evolution, viewpoint diversity}

Behold, an Article on Faith and Evolution with No Axe-Grinding; Congratulations to Tyler O’Neil

_{David Klinghoffer
June 28, 2016

Faith & Science, Science Reporting

3}

I worry when I see a headline like "4 Reasons Christians Can Believe in Evolution." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 24, 2016

Categories
Faith & Science
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __tedited, atheism, God Hypothesis, Jerry Coyne, Response to Criticism, scientific debate}

Fellow Atheist Dismayed at A.C. Grayling’s Debate Performance Versus Rabbi Rowe

_{David Klinghoffer
June 24, 2016

Faith & Science, Physical Sciences

3}

It must come as a disappointment that the young rabbi and former tank driver with the Israel Defense Force got the better of the distinguished philosopher. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
June 23, 2016

Categories
Faith & Science
Philosophy
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __tedited, accountability, atheism, begging the question, causality, circular causality, cosmic beginning, deism, empiricism, genetic fallacy, God Hypothesis, ground of existence, intelligent agency, motivated reasoning, natural evil, rationality, scientific debate, self-refutation, teleology, theism}

The Rowe-Grayling Debate

_{Michael Egnor
June 23, 2016

Faith & Science, Philosophy, Scientific Reasoning

7}

Grayling's problem is not merely his frank incompetence in open debate (you can understand his penchant for censorship). Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
June 10, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __tedited, absence of evidence, alignment, common descent, egg laying, genes, genetic similarities, S. Joshua Swamidass, scientific debate, scientific explanation, scientific reasoning, synteny, V.J. Torley}

Vincent Torley Thinks I Have Egg on My Face

_{Ann Gauger
June 10, 2016

Evolution, Genetics

12}

I didn't expect to be honored by a 7500-word broadside by philosopher Dr. Vincent Torley, assisted by Dr. Josh Swamidass of Washington University. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Cornelius Hunter

Date
May 31, 2016

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Science Education
Tagged
, __tedited, bias, BioLogos Foundation, common ancestry, comparative biology, Dennis Venema, faith and science, genetics, human genome, pedagogy, population genetics, scientific debate, Warfare Thesis}

Human Chromosome Two: An Open Letter to BioLogos on the Genetic Evidence, Cont.

_{Cornelius Hunter
May 31, 2016

Evolution, Faith & Science, Science Education

6}

The claim that the empirical evidence powerfully confirms evolution is an objective claim that can be evaluated in the common language of science. Read More ›