Tag: peer review | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 7, 2023

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, faith, Forrest Mims, gender, humanity, molecular biologists, molecular motors, peer review, Physics Today, progress, race, science, Science (journal), scientists, The Descent of Man, trust, University of North Carolina, Wesley Smith}

Repair Trust in Science? In Science Magazine, Forrest Mims Replies

_{Casey Luskin
June 7, 2023

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Charles Darwin is an example of a brilliant scientist who was nonetheless an imperfect human with some false ideas. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
July 30, 2022

Categories
Bioethics
Culture
Tagged
, Alzheimer’s disease, autism, biotechnology, brain, depression, fraud, funding, measles, mumps, peer review, public health, Research, rubella, Science (journal), serotonin, The Lancet, Vaccines}

Scientists Are Undermining Our Trust in Science

_{Wesley J. Smith
July 30, 2022

Bioethics, Culture

3}

Falsification of scientific research has been a chronic problem for the sector in recent years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Cornelius Hunter

Date
March 16, 2022

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, Bayes’ Theorem, COVID-19, design detection, evolution, intelligent design, natural processes, Nature Medicine, New York Times, Nicholas Wade, pandemic, peer review, SARS-CoV-2, spike protein, Thomas Bayes, viruses}

COVID-19 Meets Intelligent Design

_{Cornelius Hunter
March 16, 2022

Biology, Intelligent Design, Medicine

9}

To summarize, the authors use a terrible design hypothesis, and make ever-escalating claims of certainty from two weak observations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
September 18, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, Brent Spiner, Darwinism, Forensics, intelligent design, Mind Matters, Nature (journal), Nicholas Caputo, peer review, PNAS, Robert J. Marks II, Silicon Valley, Sleeping Beauty, William A. Dembski}

Detecting Malicious Intent in Undisputed Design

_{Science and Culture
September 18, 2021

Intelligent Design, Neuroscience & Mind

9}

Within clearly designed objects, malicious intents can lurk. Intelligent design theory handles those, too, and should. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 5, 2020

Categories
Biology
Fine-tuning
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Tagged
, Anthropic Principle, Cambridge Medical Research Council Centre, Darwinian mechanisms, Douglas Axe, Günter Bechly, information, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Latin, Michael Behe, molecular biology, Ola Hössjer, peer review, protein evolution, Robert J. Marks II, scientists, statistics, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University, Undeniable (book), University of Tromsø, waiting-time problem, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Breakout Paper in Journal of Theoretical Biology Explicitly Supports Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
October 5, 2020

Biology, Fine-tuning, Intelligent Design, Mathematics

17}

If the paper is any indication, appearing as it does in a prominent journal, some of the suffocating constraints on ID advocacy may be coming off. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
October 2, 2020

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, agriculture, Ann Gauger, cancel culture, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, creator, Darwinists, disclaimer, Discovery Institute, discrimination, Douglas Axe, Foresight (book), Günter Bechly, Journal of Theoretical Biology, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Nobel laureates, Ola Hössjer, peer review, Return of the God Hypothesis, Robert J. Marks II, Steinar Thorvaldsen, Stephen Meyer, Stockholm University, The Fitness of Nature for Mankind}

Despite Darwinists’ Cancel Culture, Intelligent Design Has a Breakthrough in Biology Journal

_{John G. West
October 2, 2020

Biology, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

3}

The article survived peer-review and was accepted for publication despite the open hostility of the journal’s top editors! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 30, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, adaptive mutations, biologists, biology journals, bioRxiv, Darwin Centennial, E. coli, evolution, hybridization, intelligent design, natural selection, Nature (journal), Neo-Darwinism, paleobiology, peer review, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, punctuated equilibrium, punk eek, random mutations, redundancy, Scopes Monkey Trial, stem cells, Stephen Jay Gould, sunflowers, University of British Columbia, University of Southern California}

Five New Biology Papers Show Cracks in Darwin’s Foundation

_{Science and Culture
July 30, 2020

Evolution

8}

Are there rumblings of discontent? Is it getting safer to question the claims of conventional neo-Darwinism? Read More ›

Best Job Candidate, Interview Preparation, Detail shots of someone polishing shoes

^{Type
post

Date
April 22, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Scientific Trustworthiness
Tagged
, __edited, arXiv, bioRxiv, C.S. Lewis, Christian Reflections, consciousness, Cornell University, economics, evolution, evolutionary anthropology, Francis Bacon, high school, history, integrity, intelligent design, J.P. Moreland, Janet Browne, Jay Richards, journals, laymen, March for Science, morality, Nature (journal), pandemic, peer review, PLOS Biology, Politicians, predatory journals, Science Advances, scientific method, scientism, scientists, Stephen Meyer, universe, World War II, X Club}

How to Restore Science’s Lost Luster

_{Science and Culture
April 22, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Scientific Trustworthiness

14}

More and more, the scientific establishment looks like a special interest group with biases of their own. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 12, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, atheism, biologists, cells, Charles Darwin, Darwin Day, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, Discovery Institute, evolution, Evolution News, evolutionary biology, intelligent design, Lehigh University, materialists, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, microbiology, peer review, Secrets of the Cell with Michael Behe, social media, video}

Darwin Day Is Here! Discover the Cell’s Secrets with Michael Behe

_{David Klinghoffer
February 12, 2020

Intelligent Design

3}

Today, for the birthday of Charles Darwin, celebrated around the world as Darwin Day, Discovery Institute is proud to launch a new, five-part video series. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 7, 2020

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, ACLU, animal phyla, bias, Cambrian Explosion, complex specified information, Darwin's Doubt, Dover trial, evolution, Evolution News, genetic information, goal-directedness, gold standard, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jonathan Wells, Judge John Jones, Manyuan Long, Michael Behe, peer review, scientific literature, Stephen Meyer, teleology, tweeting, Twitter, William A. Dembski}

ID Literature and the Great Evolutionary Firewall

_{Science and Culture
February 7, 2020

Intelligent Design

6}

If you’re going to engage people on the topic of intelligent design publications, don’t let them force two false assumptions on you. Read More ›