Tag: peer review | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

Bladderwort underwater with soft sunlight illuminating delicate leaves

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 24, 2015

Categories
Botany
Genetics
Tagged
, __nedited, ENCODE, eukaryotes, Irreducible Complexity, irreducibly complex systems, microbiology, peer review, peer-reviewed, research idea, transposons, Utricularia, Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig}

Peer-Reviewed Article on Transposable Elements Cites “Irreducible Complexity” and Other “Teleologic” Factors

_{Casey Luskin
December 24, 2015

Botany, Genetics

4}

Plant geneticist Wolf-Ekkehard L�nnig argues that irreducibly complex structures may defy explanation by TEs or other Darwinian factors. Read More ›

Aerial View of a large Public University in Ames, Iowa

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 18, 2015

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, ID research program, peer review, peer-reviewed, Research, science}

No ID Research? Let’s Help Out This Iowa State Student

_{Casey Luskin
December 18, 2015

Intelligent Design, Science Education

26}

Responding to students who attack intelligent design is tricky. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 29, 2015

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Evolutionary Informatics Lab, peer review, Research, Robert J. Marks II, science, William A. Dembski}

Research by Dembski and Marks Makes Inroads in Technical Literature

_{Casey Luskin
July 29, 2015

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Intelligent design is making unmistakable progress in mainstream scientific thinking. Here's an example from a new paper in the journal of Soft Computing. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 10, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA, peer review, Research, science}

Neo-Darwinism’s Catch-22: Before Evolving New Features, Organisms Would Be Swamped by Genetic Junk

_{Casey Luskin
April 10, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

A new peer-reviewed paper in the journal Complexity presents a computational model of evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
March 18, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, junk DNA, peer review, Research}

Another Successful Prediction of Intelligent Design: Cell Paper Reports Functions for Synonymous Codons

_{Casey Luskin
March 18, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

ID expects that we should find deeper and deeper layers of function in biology, which by the same token represents a big problem for Darwinian evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
January 23, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, Research, science}

In Light of New BIO-Complexity Paper, Maintaining Neo-Darwinism Means Rejecting Established Methods of Historical Science

_{Casey Luskin
January 23, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

The typical response from evolutionists is that perhaps ancient enzymes were different, and more readily mutable to acquire new functions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
January 22, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, biologic institute, peer review, Research, science}

Biologic Institute’s Groundbreaking Peer-Reviewed Science Has Now Demonstrated the Implausibility of Evolving New Proteins

_{Casey Luskin
January 22, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Darwin observed that his theory "breaks down" when large leaps of complexity are needed in order to provide some advantage. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 20, 2014

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, Research, science}

Paper Suggests Catch 22: Neo-Darwinism Faces Either a Massive Molecular Clock Misfire, or a Major Biogeographical Conundrum

_{Casey Luskin
December 20, 2014

Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

Molecular clocks are notoriously unreliable indicators of a lineage's evolutionary age. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 18, 2014

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, Research, science, Systems Biology}

Peer-Reviewed Science: What the Field of Systems Biology Can Tell Us About Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
July 18, 2014

Intelligent Design

6}

"'Reverse engineering' would seem to imply that there was 'engineering' in the first place." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
July 17, 2014

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, science, Systems Biology}

When Biologists Think Like Engineers: How the Burgeoning Field of Systems Biology Supports Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
July 17, 2014

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

What if many scientists are doing this and they don't even realize it? Read More ›