When Biologists Think Like Engineers: How the Burgeoning Field of Systems Biology Supports Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
July 17, 2014

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

What if many scientists are doing this and they don't even realize it? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 2, 2014

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, Research, science}

Peer-Reviewed Paper: Development Needs Ontogenetic Information that Cannot Arise from Neo-Darwinian Mechanisms

_{Casey Luskin
June 2, 2014

Intelligent Design

11}

Papers like this show that when freed from the "central dogmas" of neo-Darwinian evolution, a theory of intelligent design can open up promising and fruitful avenues of research and thinking. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 18, 2014

Categories
Computational Sciences
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, science}

Latest BIO-Complexity Paper Finds that on Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe Has Not Been Refuted

_{Casey Luskin
April 18, 2014

Computational Sciences, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

"Behe's concept of irreducible complexity has not been falsified by computer models." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 7, 2014

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, Research, science}

BIO-Complexity Paper: Why Chaitin’s Mathematical “Proof” of Darwinian Evolution Fails

_{Casey Luskin
April 7, 2014

Evolution

8}

There are many reasons why Chaitin's model does not accurately reflect how Darwinian evolution works, if it does work, in the real world. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 20, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, DNA, peer review, Research}

Codes Within Codes: How Dual-Use Codons Challenge Statistical Methods for Inferring Natural Selection

_{Casey Luskin
December 20, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

It boggles the mind to think about how such "codes within codes" could evolve by random mutation and natural selection. But that's not all. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 11, 2013

Categories
Science
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, News, peer review, Research, science, Views}

Sign of the Times: Nobel Prize-Winning Biologist Refuses to Submit Papers to Top-Tier "Luxury" Science Journals

_{Casey Luskin
December 11, 2013

Science, Scientific Freedom

8}

Occasionally at Discovery Institute we get an e-mail from some disgruntled Darwin advocate or other that taunts us by brandishing the names of luxury science journals. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 18, 2013

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, science}

Citation Counts Are Challenged as Metric of Scientific Merit

_{Casey Luskin
October 18, 2013

Intelligent Design

3}

An otherwise scientifically sound paper might not be cited for reasons that are political, not scientific. In the intelligent-design movement, we've seen this many times. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
August 28, 2013

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, BIO-Complexity, peer review, Research}

The Fabric of Nature: Michael Denton’s New BIO-Complexity Paper Argues for “Laws of Form” Finely Tuned for Life

_{Casey Luskin
August 28, 2013

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

Just as Darwinism cannot explain these laws, the laws themselves cannot explain all the adaptive complexity of life. Structuralism leaves plenty of room for intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 13, 2013

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, peer review, Research, science}

Peer-Reviewed Pro-Intelligent Design Articles and the “Insurrection” Against Journal Impact Factors

_{Casey Luskin
June 13, 2013

Intelligent Design

8}

An e-mail correspondent challenges our list of peer-reviewed pro-ID articles, pointing out that some of the journals are apparently not listed in the Thomson-Reuters Journal Citation Reports. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 13, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Evolutionary Informatics Lab, peer review, Robert J. Marks II, science, William A. Dembski}

Peer-Reviewed Science: There Isn’t “Plenty of Time for Evolution”

_{Casey Luskin
December 13, 2012

Evolution

11}

Once again, the Evolutionary Informatics Lab has shown that simulations of evolution seem to work only because they've been intelligently designed. Read More ›