Problems with Peer-Review: A Brief Summary

_{Casey Luskin
February 10, 2012

Intelligent Design, Science

4}

The peer-review system is largely devoted to maintaining the status quo. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 10, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom day, Darwin Day, evolution, intelligent design, peer review, Research, science}

Intelligent Design Is Peer-Reviewed, but Is Peer-Review a Requirement of Good Science?

_{Casey Luskin
February 10, 2012

Intelligent Design

26}

Einstein's original paper on relativity was published in a scientific journal (Annalen der Physik), but did not undergo formal peer-review. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jay W. Richards

Date
February 9, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Alvin Plantinga, Darwinists, evolution, intelligent design, peer review, Richard Dawkins, science, Where the Conflict Really Lies}

“A Bit Unprepossessing”: Plantinga on the Logic of Dawkins’s Blind Watchmaker

_{Jay W. Richards
February 9, 2012

Evolution, Faith & Science

1}

As we head into Evolution Sunday, I offer this second installment in a series of reviews of Alvin Plantinga's long-awaited new book. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 8, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinists, DNA, genome, intelligent design, peer review, Richard Sternberg, science, Thomas Woodward}

Measuring the Pervasiveness of the “Myth of No Peer-Reviewed Research”

_{David Klinghoffer
February 8, 2012

Intelligent Design

1}

Why let a little thing like the truth get in the way of such a beguiling lie? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 8, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, DNA, epigenetics, genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, peer review, Richard Sternberg, science, Thomas Woodward}

Tom Woodward’s The Mysterious Epigenome: Effectively Popularizing Richard Sternberg’s Revolutionary Thesis

_{Casey Luskin
February 8, 2012

Intelligent Design, Life Sciences

8}

Far more than biology has been willing to admit, animal body plans and other features of life are determined by information sources that lie outside of DNA itself. Read More ›

Business Team Brainstorming Over Documents in Office

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 8, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __nedited, creationism, definist fallacy, double standard, Evolution Sunday, exclusion, ID research program, intelligent design, Joshua Rosenau, Judge Jones, misinformation, peer review, peer-reviewed, science, scientific method, Stephen Meyer, testability, theistic evolution}

As the Intelligent Design Movement Publishes Peer-Reviewed Literature, Critics Backpedal

_{Casey Luskin
February 8, 2012

Intelligent Design

9}

Though Judge Jones's findings were false when he made them in 2005, many have used his ruling as an excuse to perpetuate these false criticisms of ID. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 7, 2012

Categories
Computational Sciences
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Biomimetics, computer simulations, Darwinism, DNA, evolution, information, intelligent design, Modern evolutionary synthesis, peer review, science}

If Engineers Program DNA, Is It Intelligent Design?

_{Science and Culture
February 7, 2012

Computational Sciences, Intelligent Design

1}

The intelligent design movement may now take a bow and say, "We told you so." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 7, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Baylor University, Darwin, Evolution Sunday, God and Evolution, intelligent design, peer review, religion, Robert J. Marks II, William A. Dembski}

The Evolutionary Informatics Lab: Putting Intelligent Design Predictions to the Test

_{Casey Luskin
February 7, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

The lab got off to a rough start in 2007 when Baylor administrators learned that Robert Marks was doing ID-friendly research on the campus. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert L. Crowther, II

Date
February 6, 2012

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin, Evolution Sunday, God and Evolution, intelligent design, peer review, religion}

Responding to Darwinists Who Get Religion on Evolution Sunday: A Collection of Ready Resources

_{Robert Crowther
February 6, 2012

Faith & Science

1}

When religion comes up in the evolution debate it is almost always an atheist or a theistic evolutionist who raises the subject. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
February 6, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinism, evolution, extraterrestrials, Guillermo Gonzalez, habitable zone, Modern evolutionary synthesis, peer review, planet}

Peer-Reviewed Paper Concludes that Darwinism “Has Pretty Much Reached the End of Its Rope”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
February 6, 2012

Evolution

1}

A new paper offers the concession that the modern evolutionary synthesis has never provided an account of "how major forms of life evolved." Read More ›