Peer-Reviewed Articles in International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics Argue for a Designed Universe

_{Casey Luskin
February 6, 2012

Intelligent Design

9}

Though the journal has published a couple of papers in recent years that are sympathetic to ID, I know of no direct evidence that this journal itself is friendly to ID. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 5, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Biomimetics, Darwinism, intelligent design, peer review, Wikipedia}

Wikipedia and the Sociology of Darwinian Belief

_{David Klinghoffer
February 5, 2012

Intelligent Design

1}

As anyone knows who's followed the popular Darwinist blogging sites, Darwinism is an ideological movement seemingly rich in believers unhindered by responsibilities to family or work. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 3, 2012

Categories
Botany
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinian theory, intelligent design, James Shapiro, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, peer review}

Surveying Peer-Reviewed Pro-Intelligent Design Papers by Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

_{Casey Luskin
February 3, 2012

Botany, Intelligent Design

6}

Lönnig's publications show that experimental research on plant breeding can have positive implications for intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 2, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinian theory, intelligent design, James Shapiro, peer review, science}

Beyond the Flow of Pro-ID Scientific Publications, a Much Greater Ferment of Doubt About Darwinism

_{David Klinghoffer
February 2, 2012

Intelligent Design

1}

Impressive evidence of scientists who don't support ID but who do trash the primary Darwinian thesis. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert L. Crowther, II

Date
February 2, 2012

Categories
Bioethics
Tagged
, __k-review, intelligent design, peer review, Politics, Research, Views}

Republicans and Science (as Opposed to Liberals and the Science They’ve Politicized)

_{Robert Crowther
February 2, 2012

Bioethics

1}

Hot-button scientific topics have been politicized. Not by Republicans, however.

Oldies but Goodies: Update of Peer-Reviewed Articles Page Turns Up Long Lost Pro-Intelligent Design Papers

_{Casey Luskin
February 2, 2012

Intelligent Design

4}

The first pro-ID paper in our listing was published in 1984 by nuclear physicist William G. Pollard in the American Journal of Physics under the title "Rumors of transcendence in physics." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 1, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Day, Evolution Sunday, intelligent design, peer review, Research}

In Time for Darwin Day, It’s Our New List of Pro-ID Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers; 50th Paper Published in 2011

_{Science & Culture
February 1, 2012

Evolution, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

What do you give to an exhausted relic of antique 19th-century scientific materialism that has everything but genuine credibility? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
January 18, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, Baylor University, David Abel, evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, Michael Behe, peer review, science}

Peer-Reviewed Paper Argues that the Origin of Life Required “Purposeful Choices”

_{Casey Luskin
January 18, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

2}

What is it that distinguishes life from non-living entities? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David K. DeWolf

Date
January 17, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, David Abel, David Barash, economics, evolution, intelligent design, peer review}

Evolutionary Psychology Meets Economics 101

_{David K. DeWolf
January 17, 2012

Evolution

1}

In an effort to show that "evolution" has vast explanatory power, David Barash refers to a survey of graduate students in public health at Harvard. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
January 17, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Baylor University, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, evolution, fossils, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, Michael Behe, peer review}

Peer-Reviewed Paper in Medical Journal Challenges Evolutionary Science and Inaccurate Evolution-Education

_{Casey Luskin
January 17, 2012

Evolution

9}

The paper begins by recounting some of the arguments raised during the Texas State Board of Education debate that challenged chemical and biological evolution. Read More ›