Tag: New Scientist | Page 8 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
August 24, 2019

Categories
Ethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __edited, China, Communist Party, heart, human rights, kidney, liver, New Scientist, organs, Retraction Watch}

Fifteen Science Papers Retracted Over China Illegal Organ Harvesting

_{Wesley J. Smith
August 24, 2019

Ethics, Medicine

2}

Human-rights activists have castigated China for allowing this organ bazaar for years. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 29, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, Alexander Oparin, Charles Darwin, chemical evolution, coacervates, Darwin Devolves, Douglas Axe, evolution, Illustra Media, intelligent design, J.B.S. Haldane, James Tour, Joseph Hooker, Last Universal Common Ancestor, materialists, Michael Behe, Nature (journal), New Scientist, PNAS, protoplasm, Science Magazine, Science Uprising, toxins, Undeniable (book), University of Minnesota}

Not Oparin’s Coacervates Again!

_{Science & Culture
July 29, 2019

Evolution, Origin of Life

8}

After Oparin’s coacervate theory was presented in the 1920s, it was dismissed as unworkable. Now, coacervates are back in style. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 6, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, APOB, Arthur Hunt, blubber, brown bears, Cell (journal), cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, devolution, evolution, high fat diet, Liu et al. (2014), mice, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, Nature Reviews Genetics, New Scientist, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Shiping Liu}

Polar Bear Seminar: New Evidence That Michael Behe Is Right

_{Casey Luskin
May 6, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

30}

Many studies show that degradative mutations in APOB cause decreased cholesterol. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 3, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, arthropods, Biomimetics, blood, Burgess Shale, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, cilia, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian evolution, exoplanets, Hallucigenia, intelligent design, Live Science, Mars, Michael Behe, mollusks, Nature (journal), New Scientist, Science (journal), Texas A&M, University of Alberta, University of Warwick, white blood cells}

Read Carefully, Nature News Conspires to Refute Darwinism

_{Science & Culture
May 3, 2019

Intelligent Design

7}

The kingfisher bird has to dive after fish rapidly without busting its beak. Japanese scientists looked into the physics of this, and redesigned the noses of their bullet trains. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 29, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, Aarhus University, arctic tern, butterflies, CRISPR, Current Biology, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Finches, dolphins, echolocation, Flight: The Genius of Birds, Florida, George Washington University, Illustra Media, Living Waters, Lund University, Mexico, Michael Behe, migration, Monarch butterflies, Nature (journal), New Scientist, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Richard Sternberg, salmon, Sweden, University of Seville, whales}

Encore Performances in the Design of Life

_{Science & Culture
November 29, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

News from Princeton discusses the work of Tom Smith and Bridgett vonHoldt, who have solved a “long-standing finch beak mystery.” The answer turned out to be Mendelian, not Darwinian. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
November 28, 2018

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __cedited, China, Darwinian theory, East Africa, East Asia, Ethiopia, Europeans, Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, human origins, India, Israel, Middle Palaeolithic, Middle Pleistocene, Misliya cave, modern humans, Nature (journal), Neanderthals, New Scientist, Racism, rewriting}

Rewriting Human Origins, Ongoing in East Asia

_{Günter Bechly
November 28, 2018

Human Origins and Anthropology

12}

The reason all these new discoveries are so noteworthy is not because they represent the usual progress of science. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
November 20, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __cedited, "Out of Africa", Africa, annus horribilis, China, fossil record, hominids, Homo erectus, Homo sapiens, human origins, Middle Pleistocene, New Scientist, paleontology, skull}

What, Another “Rewrite” of the Human Origins Story? How About a Rethink, Instead?

_{Günter Bechly
November 20, 2017

Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology

6}

Sometimes predictions are not only fulfilled but over-fulfilled. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 24, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, A. N. Wilson, biography, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, David Klinghoffer, eugenics, evolution, Georges Cuvier, John West, Jonathan Wells, Lamarckian theory, New Scientist, Stephen Meyer}

Early Review of A.N. Wilson’s Anti-Darwin Biography Could Have Been Predicted

_{Science & Culture
August 24, 2017

Evolution

5}

We haven’t yet seen a copy of A.N. Wilson’s forthcoming anti-Darwin book, which isn’t out in the United States until December 12. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 28, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science
Tagged
, __cedited, Dan Graur, ENCODE, evolution, Genome Biology and Evolution, junk DNA, Neo-Darwinism, New Scientist, New York Post, population genetics, University of Houston}

Dan Graur, Anti-ENCODE Crusader, Is Back

_{Science & Culture
July 28, 2017

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science

5}

In arguing for 75 percent of the human genome as trash, has Dr. Graur slain the ENCODE dragon and rescued the Junk DNA myth? Nah. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 25, 2015

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, Long Term Evolution Experiment, LTEE, New Scientist, News, Research, Richard Lenski, science}

Hype from New Scientist Aside, Lenski’s E. coli Research Shows Evolution of Nothing New

_{Casey Luskin
June 25, 2015

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

4}

The pro-Darwin media love to print triumphalist articles, declaring on the thinnest of evidence that "creationists" are deathly scared of the latest science. Read More ›