Tag: cholesterol

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 27, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, APOB, Cell (journal), cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, high fat diet, Liu et al. (2014), medical literature, Michael Behe, mutations, polar bear, Polar Bear Seminar, PolyPhen-2, Shiping Liu}

#6 of Our Top Stories of 2019: Polar Bear Seminar

_{Casey Luskin
December 27, 2019

Evolution

12}

Barring startling new revelations from the research community, nothing more needs to be said. The evidence comes down decisively on Behe’s side. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 12, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, evolutionary change, intelligent design, Michael Behe, natural selection, polar bears, Science Advances, seals, zebrafish}

Behe Vindicated Again: Goldfish Are Broken Carp

_{Science & Culture
July 12, 2019

Evolution

9}

How do you make a goldfish? You break things, just like Michael Behe said. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, Cell (journal), cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, high fat diet, Liu et al. (2014), medical literature, Michael Behe, mutations, polar bear, Polar Bear Seminar, PolyPhen-2, Shiping Liu}

Polar Bear Seminar: This Is the End

_{Casey Luskin
May 6, 2019

Evolution

11}

Barring startling new revelations from the research community, nothing more needs to be said. The evidence comes down decisively on Behe’s side. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 6, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, Arthur Hunt, blubber, brown bears, Cell (journal), cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, devolution, evolution, high fat diet, Liu et al. (2014), mice, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, Nature Reviews Genetics, New Scientist, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Shiping Liu}

Polar Bear Seminar: New Evidence That Michael Behe Is Right

_{Casey Luskin
May 6, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

30}

Many studies show that degradative mutations in APOB cause decreased cholesterol. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
May 2, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, adaptation, amino acids, APOB, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, diet, disease, evolution, function, genes, genome, genotype, mice, Michael Behe, mutations, phenotype, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, proteins, Shiping Liu}

Remind Me Again Why We Picked Polar Bears?

_{Ann Gauger
May 2, 2019

Evolution

16}

The core difficulty for some scientists who read Michael Behe’s book is also the key idea at its heart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 8, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, algorithms, APOB, Arthur Hunt, Cell (journal), cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian mechanism, degradative mutations, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, proteins, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Shiping Liu}

Polar Bear Seminar: The APOB Gene and Damaging Mutations

_{Casey Luskin
April 8, 2019

Evolution

20}

Michael Behe correctly interpreted a paper by Liu et al. and followed its methodology, whereas his critics, Lents and Hunt, did not. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 5, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, Arthur Hunt, Cell (journal), chloroquine resistance, cholesterol, Darwin Day, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, Evolution News, genome, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, pigmentation, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Shiping Liu, The Edge of Evolution}

Polar Bear Seminar: Why Behe Is Right

_{Casey Luskin
April 5, 2019

Evolution

5}

Starting today, you’re invited to sit back and enjoy a five-part series on polar bear genes in light of Behe’s thesis in Darwin Devolves. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
History of Science
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, blubber, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian mechanism, DNA, evolution, genes, mice, Michigan State University, polar bears, proteins, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, Science (journal), Telliamed Revisited, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Lessons from Polar Bear Studies

_{Michael Behe
March 6, 2019

Evolution, History of Science, Philosophy of Science

10}

Computer methods of analyzing mutations are widely used because they are generally accurate. They do not suddenly lose their accuracy when I cite them. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
January 28, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, animal kingdom, beauty, butterfly wings, cholesterol, Darwinian mechanism, David Snoke, law, literature, mind, music, mutations, natural selection, nutrition, sexual selection}

Here’s How to Tell if Scientists Are Exaggerating

_{Michael Behe
January 28, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Here’s the simple test to tell if scientists are exaggerating wildly. Let’s call it: “The Principle of Comparative Difficulty.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 11, 2017

Categories
Evolution
Life Sciences
Science
Tagged
, __k-review, "Science Says", “consensus science”, cholesterol, Darwinian evolution, diet, eggs, health, Icons of Evolution, Jonathan Wells, Zombie Science (book)}

Zombie Science: The War on Eggs

_{David Klinghoffer
July 11, 2017

Evolution, Life Sciences, Science

2}

The fallibility of the scientific “consensus” is revealed in no humbler, more everyday form than chicken eggs. Read More ›