Tag: Wikipedia | Page 6 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 28, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, censorship, creationists, evidence, evolution, free speech, Germany, Günter Bechly, intellect, intelligent design, Marco Respinti, paleontologists, S. Joshua Swamidass, Stuttgart, United States, Wikipedia}

To an Italian ID Group, Günter Bechly Explains His Remarkable Journey

_{David Klinghoffer
June 28, 2021

Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

2}

Having opened his mind to the possibility of design, Dr. Bechly saw it everywhere. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
April 22, 2021

Categories
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, artificial intelligence, computer science, deep learning, elephant, Erik Larson, human intelligence, Neural Networks, philosophers, programmers, The Myth of Artificial Intelligence, understanding, Wikipedia}

The Myth of “Deep Learning”

_{William A. Dembski
April 22, 2021

Neuroscience & Mind

2}

This is pathetic, and this is what is supposed to lay waste and supersede human intelligence? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 9, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Aristotle, articles, Casey Luskin, censorship, China, curriculum, disinformation, Douglas Axe, Evolution News, government, Guillermo Gonzalez, Human Zoos, intelligent design, IntelligentDesign.Org, Jay Richards, John West, Jonathan Wells, Larry Sanger, New York Times, News, Plato, propaganda, Stephen Meyer, video, Wikipedia, William A. Dembski}

For Darwin Day, Website Resists Disinformation Campaign Against Intelligent Design

_{David Klinghoffer
February 9, 2021

Intelligent Design, Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

3}

If you like the idea of living in China, then the government using the Internet to tell everyone what to believe should sound like just the ticket. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 5, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, Bioscience, critics, Darwinists, disease, evolution, fossil record, Jackson Wheat, Jerry Coyne, Long Story Short, Neo-Darwinism, population genetics, scientists, The Conversation, whales, Wikipedia, YouTube videos}

Whales — Time to Put Evolution’s Exhausted “Poster Child” to Rest

_{David Klinghoffer
August 5, 2020

Biology, Evolution

3}

The argument about whales turns on two points: “Population genetics calculations say no,” and “New fossil find throws the series into disarray.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 29, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, censorship, Center for Science and Culture, chaos, COVID-19, creativity, editors, Evolution News, Facebook, free speech, freedom, Google, Günter Bechly, Human Zoos, Internet, Larry Sanger, lies, Long Story Short, pandemic, Science Uprising, Seattle, social media, thought police, truth, Twitter, Walter Bradley, Wikipedia, YouTube videos}

Here’s How We Get Around the Wikipedia Roadblock

_{David Klinghoffer
June 29, 2020

Scientific Freedom

3}

Newcomers to intelligent design often ask us about a certain influential online encyclopedia. We have to laugh. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 25, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, brown bears, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, evolution, genes, genetic information, genome, hemoglobin, Himalayas, loss of function, Michael Behe, Mount Everest, mount improbable, natural selection, oxygen, PNAS, polar bears, positive selection, Wikipedia}

Behe Vindicated Again: Sherpas Climb Everest Easier, Because Darwin Devolves

_{Science & Culture
May 25, 2020

Evolution

10}

How can Tibetans survive high altitudes that leave lowlanders gasping? The answer is found in broken genes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
May 12, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, animals, body plans, Cambrian Explosion, Carl Zimmer, China, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinian evolution, Darwinian theory, Donald Prothero, Ediacaran biota, embryos, fossil record, Jerry Coyne, Metazoa, metazoans, microfossils, Namibia, New York Times, Nick Matzke, Norway, paleontology, precambrian fossils, protists, Russia, snowball Earth, South Australia, spicules, sponges, Stephen Meyer, Trilobozoa, White Sea, Wikipedia}

The Myth of Precambrian Sponges

_{Günter Bechly
May 12, 2020

Evolution

54}

Evolutionists would expect to find sponges as the earliest animals in the fossil record. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 13, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, appendix, Charles Darwin, coccyx, Darwin-skeptics, diarrhea, disabilities, evolution, Foresight (book), Francis Collins, Icons of Evolution, Immune System, infection, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, John West, Jonathan Wells, Kenneth Miller, Marcos Eberlin, Michael Egnor, Nature Reviews Genetics, pseudogenes, The Biology of the Second Reich, The Myth of Junk DNA, vestigial structures, Wikipedia, Zombie Science (book)}

Pseudogenes Are Going the Way of Darwin’s “Rudimentary Organs”

_{Science & Culture
April 13, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

9}

Long described as useless leftovers of evolution, pseudogenes are rising from the junk pile as functional entities. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
February 25, 2020

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, American Museum of Natural History, Ann Gauger, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, Bernard Wood, Big Bang, Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, Genetics and the Origin of Species (book), George Gaylord Simpson, George Washington University, Günter Bechly, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo sapiens, human origins, Ian Tattersall, intelligent design, macroevolution, Neo-Darwinism, neutral evolution, On the Origin of Species, Phillip E. Johnson, punctuated equilibrium, randomness, Richard Buggs, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Wikipedia}

Neo-Darwinism and the Big Bang of Man’s Origin

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
February 25, 2020

Human Origins and Anthropology

37}

Proponents of the ruling theory tell us that we are all undoubtedly intelligent enough to fully grasp their theory, as long as we concur with it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
January 21, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, censorship, conference, debate, economy, Enlightenment, free market, free speech, men, National Association of Scholars, post-modernism, science, Twitter, Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia, women}

To Create or Destroy, Via Twitter

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 21, 2020

Scientific Freedom

4}

Wood here is the creator. Teytelman is the would-be destroyer. He could work with people sympathetic to his view to hold an alternate conference. Read More ›