Tag: macroevolution | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 23, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, animation, bats, Center for Science and Culture, convergent evolution, Darwinists, David Berlinski, dolphins, echolocation, fossil record, fruit flies, ghost lineages, homology, humor, James Shapiro, Jonathan Wells, macroevolution, microevolution, Pakicetus, random mutations, Richard Sternberg, Robert Crowther, testes, Theodosius Dobzhansky, waiting-time problem, whales}

Whale of a Webinar Debuts a Delightful “Long Story Short” Video

_{David Klinghoffer
April 23, 2020

Evolution

4}

Whales are held up as a model of what unguided evolution can do in a short time: in this case, just 8 million years, or perhaps even half that. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
March 30, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, __cedited, body plans, Charles Darwin, China, coronavirus, COVID-19, Darwinian evolution, Design Inference, disease, DNA, Edward Jenner, epidemic, evolution, evolutionary biologists, intelligent design, living cell, macroevolution, medicine, molecular biology, mutations, natural selection, Nature Medicine, New York Post, On the Origin of Species, organs, oxygen, pandemic, quarantine, RNA, SARS-CoV-2, species, Theodosius Dobzhansky, viruses, World Health Organization, Wuhan}

Coronavirus, Intelligent Design, and Evolution

_{Jonathan Wells
March 30, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Medicine

4}

The measures being taken against the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic owe nothing to evolutionary theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
February 25, 2020

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __edited, American Museum of Natural History, Ann Gauger, Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus afarensis, Bernard Wood, Big Bang, Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, Genetics and the Origin of Species (book), George Gaylord Simpson, George Washington University, Günter Bechly, Homo erectus, Homo habilis, Homo sapiens, human origins, Ian Tattersall, intelligent design, macroevolution, Neo-Darwinism, neutral evolution, On the Origin of Species, Phillip E. Johnson, punctuated equilibrium, randomness, Richard Buggs, Richard Dawkins, Stephen Jay Gould, Theodosius Dobzhansky, Wikipedia}

Neo-Darwinism and the Big Bang of Man’s Origin

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
February 25, 2020

Human Origins and Anthropology

37}

Proponents of the ruling theory tell us that we are all undoubtedly intelligent enough to fully grasp their theory, as long as we concur with it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
February 21, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, arthropods, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, David Klinghoffer, Douglas Futuyma, evolution, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, Galápagos Islands, history, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, macroevolution, natural selection, neo-Darwinian synthesis, organisms, William Paley}

I Disagree with David Klinghoffer, But It’s My Fault for the Confusion

_{Paul Nelson
February 21, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

5}

Evolution is an implication — that is, an empirical consequence — of design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
February 17, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __edited, Charles Darwin, Divine Foot, evolution, free will, Genetics and the Origin of Species (book), intelligent design, macroevolution, microevolution, mind, spirit, Theodosius Dobzhansky, William A. Dembski, Zombie Science (book)}

On Evolution, Can’t We All Just Get Along?

_{Jonathan Wells
February 17, 2020

Evolution, Faith & Science

6}

Lutheran theologian Ted Peters concludes that “a culture war is raging, to be sure. But, this is not a war between science and faith.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 21, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, Are We Here to Re-Create Ourselves?, Center for Science and Culture, clones, Discovery Institute, evolution, Geoffrey Simmons, intelligent design, life, macroevolution, physician, robots, water cycle}

An “Enthralling” New Book from Discovery Fellow Geoffrey Simmons

_{David Klinghoffer
November 21, 2019

Intelligent Design

2}

Here it is in Kirkus Reviews, not previously known to me for showing sympathy toward the theory of intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Stephen C. Meyer

Date
November 6, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Cavendish Laboratory, Darwin on Trial, Darwinism, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, evolutionary theory, fruit flies, Harvard University, human origins, Louisiana, macroevolution, methodological naturalism, Michael Denton, Michael Ruse, moths, National Academy of Sciences, Natural History Museum, Phillip E. Johnson, Richard Dawkins, Southern Methodist University, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Meyer, Supreme Court, U.C. Berkeley, University of Chicago}

Your Witness, Mr. Johnson: A Retrospective Review of Darwin on Trial

_{Stephen C. Meyer
November 6, 2019

Evolution

8}

In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
October 2, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __edited, Arizona State University, cetaceans, chloroquine resistance, Darwin Devolves, devolution, DNA, dolphins, evolution, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Italy, macroevolution, malaria, microevolution, Paul Davies, Paul Nelson, Richard Lenski, University of Connecticut, University of Glasgow, whales}

Darwin Devolves — Evidence Keeps Rolling In

_{Michael Behe
October 2, 2019

Evolution

4}

The second paper is an in-depth look at genetic changes associated with the evolution of whales and dolphins. They found a lot of devolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
April 3, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, Africa, bacteria, Cambrian Explosion, central nervous system, cichlid fishes, circulatory system, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Finches, E. coli, effective population size, enzymes, evolution, evolutionary theory, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, fish, John Jay College, John McDonald, lemurs, macroevolution, Madagascar, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, neutral theory, nylonase, organs, ossicles, Robert J. Marks II, Skeptic Magazine, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

In His Latest Review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves, Nathan Lents Misses the Forest for the Trees

_{Brian Miller
April 3, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

Evolutionists now increasingly believe that major adaptations are driven by neutral mutations. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 14, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, body plans, Darwin's Doubt, design intuition, Douglas Axe, fossil record, Frank Turek, macroevolution, mutations, Natural History Museum, proteins, Royal Society, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Undeniable (book)}

Meyer, Axe: “Five Major Problems with Macro-Evolution”

_{David Klinghoffer
December 14, 2018

Evolution

1}

There’s something very clarifying about seeing an argument laid out in crisp bullet points. Read More ›