Tag: debate | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
July 14, 2019

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, classroom, controversy, debate, education, history, ID the Future, Michael Keas, podcast, Robert Crowther, science, teachers, Unbelievable}

Michael Keas: Improving Science Education by Understanding Science’s History

_{Science & Culture
July 14, 2019

Science Education

1}

A science historian advises teachers that “science is best taught as science is best practiced.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 27, 2019

Categories
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, __edited, abstract thought, atheism, brain, debate, epilepsy, materialism, Michael Egnor, mind, Neural Networks, neuroscience, psychiatry, Science Uprising, Stony Brook University, Wikipedia, Wilder Penfield}

Materialism Totters — Neural Network Theory to the Rescue?

_{David Klinghoffer
June 27, 2019

Neuroscience & Mind

3}

From Dr. Faizal Ali, it looks like another case of Materialism-of-the-Gaps reasoning. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
June 20, 2019

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Medicine
Tagged
, __k-review, abortion, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Medical Association, cancer, debate, egg, embryo, evolution, fertilization, fetus, gravity, human life, ideology, law, Leonardo da Vinci, National Academy of Sciences, parasite, public policy, science, scientists, sperm}

What the Abortion Debate Tells Us About Integrity in Science

_{Michael Egnor
June 20, 2019

Bioethics, Ethics, Medicine

4}

Science has quite a bit to contribute to our debate about abortion as a matter public policy. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 11, 2019

Categories
Chemistry
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, debate, Devil, foresight, genes, insults, intelligent design, metaphor, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, polar bear, Richard Lenski, Seattle}

Marcos Eberlin on Debating Evolutionists

_{David Klinghoffer
June 11, 2019

Chemistry, Intelligent Design

2}

As Eberlin observes, for Darwinists, the “devil is in the details” and they fear the devil. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
May 31, 2019

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambridge University, classroom, critical thinking, debate, denialism, education, evolution, extraterrestrials, Forbes, ID the Future, neo-Darwinian theory, Paul Nelson, scholars, scientific literature, scientists}

Indoctrination or Debate? How to Teach Evolution

_{Sarah Chaffee
May 31, 2019

Science Education

4}

A course in “Science and Nonsense” is intended to persuade, to herd students toward approved opinions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
January 22, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Human Exceptionalism
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __k-review, "God of the gaps", Darwinian theory, David Klinghoffer, debate, Douglas Axe, human life, ideology, intelligent design, Journal of Molecular Biology, Kevin Williamson, lawyers, Michael Behe, natural selection, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Research, science, Stephen Meyer, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Stifling the Intelligent Design Debate Is Bad Science

_{Wesley J. Smith
January 22, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Human Exceptionalism, Science Reporting

2}

Kevin Williamson deploys an absurd reductionist construct of the ID field as consisting of ideological assertions by “lawyers” and “amateurs.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Douglas Axe

Date
January 14, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinian theory, debate, Douglas Axe, evolution, Hans Vodder, intelligent design, No Free Lunch, scientists, theistic evolution, Undeniable (book), William A. Dembski}

Keeping the Debate Over Undeniable on Track

_{Douglas Axe
January 14, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

Hans Vodder is a friend with whom I’ve been enjoying an unfolding discussion for well over a year. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
November 1, 2018

Categories
Biology
Faith & Science
Sociology
Tagged
, __k-review, "God of the gaps", academics, Adam and Eve, Bible, BioLogos, Brian Miller, Christians, creationism, debate, Dennis Prager, evidence, evolution, evolutionary creationism, intelligent design, materialism, reality, science, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, theology}

No Escape from Theistic Evolution?

_{David Klinghoffer
November 1, 2018

Biology, Faith & Science, Sociology

6}

“TE thus represents a very deep sink or depression in the landscape of theological and scientific opinion.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 31, 2018

Categories
Biology
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, Center for Science and Culture, communication, Critical Analysis, debate, education, evolution, high school, ID the Future, podcast, Rob Crowther, Sarah Chaffee, strengths and weaknesses, students, teacher, Western civilization}

Great Idea: Let Students Debate Evolution!

_{David Klinghoffer
October 31, 2018

Biology, Science Education

2}

If standard Darwinian theory is really as ironclad as we are commanded to assume, then the exercise should reinforce belief in evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
October 12, 2018

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, competition, curriculum, debate, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, fire, Forensics, pedagogy, persuasion, science, Science Education Policy, Supreme Court}

Evolution Education — A Debater’s Perspective

_{Sarah Chaffee
October 12, 2018

Science Education

3}

William Butler Yeats noted, “Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire.” Read More ›