Tag: Forbes

^{Type
post

Author
Daniel Witt

Date
July 10, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, Denis Noble, Discovery Institute, Douglas Axe, evolution, Evolution “On Purpose”, Evolution News, Forbes, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Joana Xavier, MIT Press, neo-Darwinists, New Trends in Evolutionary Biology, Perry Marshall, persecution, physiologists, Richard Dawkins, Royal Society, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, teleonomy}

Oxford Physiologist Denis Noble: Dissent from Neo-Darwinism Has Passed a “Tipping Point”

_{Daniel Witt and David Klinghoffer
July 10, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Scientific Freedom

11}

We were wondering when the (often very dramatic) claims made recently in arcane academic texts would begin making more of a splash in the popular media. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 30, 2021

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, atmosphere, biomolecules, biosphere, carbon, carbon dioxide, Children of Light, cofactors, earth, enzymes, evolution, Forbes, galactic habitable zone, habitability, hydrogen, infrared radiation, Michael Denton, Moon, oxygen, photosynthesis, planets, radiation, unguided evolution}

Study: Planets Capable of Sustaining Photosynthesis Are Extremely Rare

_{Casey Luskin
June 30, 2021

Physical Sciences

11}

So how did the paper determine that photosynthesis has an “overall simplicity,” despite the complexity just described? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Bethel McGrew

Date
June 9, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, ARF, China, Emily Reeves, Erika DeBenedictis, Evolution News, Forbes, gene editing, genome, He Jiankui, HIV, Hong Kong, INK4a, intelligent design, Jordan Peterson, Marxists, Nature (journal), scientists, TEDx talk, twins, U.S. Senate, Wesley Smith}

Erika DeBenedictis and the Cost of Playing God

_{Bethel McGrew
June 9, 2021

Bioethics, Intelligent Design, Medicine

7}

I won’t recap the splendid work Emily Reeves has already done here in dissecting the TEDx talk from a scientific angle. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
May 4, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, academic freedom, biological origins, Center for Science and Culture, classroom, Cornell University, coronavirus, COVID-19, Facebook, Forbes, universities, Zoom}

Online Education and the Evolution Debate

_{Sarah Chaffee
May 4, 2020

Scientific Freedom

3}

Given recent developments in education, our mission has become more urgent than ever. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 20, 2020

Categories
Physical Sciences
Physics
Tagged
, __cedited, climate change, clouds, coronavirus, Cosmos 3.0, Cosmos: Possible Worlds, droughts, flooding, Forbes, geography, global warming, Jay Richards, Neil deGrasse Tyson, predictions, wildfires}

Tyson and Cosmos Sound the Climate Alarm Again

_{Science & Culture
April 20, 2020

Physical Sciences, Physics

5}

During the present coronavirus threat we can learn some valuable lessons about model predictions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 29, 2019

Categories
Biology
Geology
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, animal life, biological information, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, earth, Ethan Siegel, evolution, Forbes, foresight, global warming, human origins, intelligent design, intelligent life, James Tour, Marcos Eberlin, Science Uprising, Stephen Meyer, sun}

Life’s Hard Stop: Fortune? Or Foresight?

_{David Klinghoffer
July 29, 2019

Biology, Geology, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

3}

Here’s another “incredibly fortunate” thing about the Cambrian explosion and about evolution generally. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
May 31, 2019

Categories
Science Education
Tagged
, __cedited, Cambridge University, classroom, critical thinking, debate, denialism, education, evolution, extraterrestrials, Forbes, ID the Future, neo-Darwinian theory, Paul Nelson, scholars, scientific literature, scientists}

Indoctrination or Debate? How to Teach Evolution

_{Sarah Chaffee
May 31, 2019

Science Education

3}

A course in “Science and Nonsense” is intended to persuade, to herd students toward approved opinions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
December 5, 2018

Categories
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, __cedited, Africa, BioLogos, Charles Darwin, Daily Mail, DNA, Ernst Mayr, Forbes, Genetics and the Origin of Species (book), Homo sapiens, Human Evolution (journal), human origins, isolation, Michael Marshall, mitochondria, mitochondrial Eve, Nature (journal), Peaceful Science, speciation, species, theistic evolution, Theodosius Dobzhansky, women, Y chromosome, Y-chromosome Adam}

Does Barcoding DNA Reveal a Single Human Ancestral Pair?

_{Ann Gauger
December 5, 2018

Human Origins and Anthropology

12}

I don’t think the study can claim all the things it does based on the evidence they have. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
November 5, 2018

Categories
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __cedited, __image, civil rights, Darwinism, First Amendment, Forbes, free speech, history, intelligent design, Martin Luther King Jr., United States, University of Chicago, University of Texas}

The Forgotten Civil Right

_{Sarah Chaffee
November 5, 2018

Science Education, Scientific Freedom

5}

In resisting bullies and censors, free speech advocates have done important work. They need, however, to add science to their range of concerns. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 1, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, Albert Einstein, Alfred Russel Wallace, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinism, Ethan Siegel, evolution, Forbes, general relativity, inheritance, intelligent design, Michael Flannery, Newtonian mechanics, predictions, Royal Society, Sarah Chaffee, selection, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, Third Way of Evolution}

For This Physicist, “Overthrowing” Darwinism Is on the Table

_{David Klinghoffer
August 1, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

ID is a rival theory, a scientific theory, doing the normal work that scientific ideas must do to supplant a currently dominant idea. Read More ›