Tag: debate | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 9, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, atheism, BioLogos, debate, Denis Lamoureux, Hank Hanegraaff, Lawrence Krauss, mind, personal God, providence, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution, Toronto, universe}

Stephen Meyer Tells Hank Hanegraaff About a Providential Debate — and Much More

_{David Klinghoffer
July 9, 2021

Faith & Science

2}

There were a couple of striking things about the debate, where Meyer was overcome early on by a migraine brought on by the bright lights. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 9, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, debate, intelligent design, National Public Radio, podcast, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer, Virginia}

Listen: Stephen Meyer on NPR’s “Watching America”

_{David Klinghoffer
July 9, 2021

Intelligent Design

1}

Yes, that’s right, National Public Radio, not a place you'd normally expect to be friendly to intelligent design Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 7, 2021

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, astrophysicists, Brian Keating, debate, Galileo Galilei, knowledge, morality, PragerU, Return of the God Hypothesis, rioting, scientists, Stephen Meyer, U.C. San Diego, wisdom}

Brian Keating: Getting Nervous About “Follow the Science”

_{David Klinghoffer
April 7, 2021

Physical Sciences

4}

These are EXCELLENT. I would say the themes of all three have to do with the importance of not worshipping scientists or imagining that science is infallible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 3, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, chemists, chess, debate, Discovery Institute, intelligent design, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, National Public Radio, Paul Ashby, Return of the God Hypothesis}

No Sweat: When Meyer Debated a Chemist and a Biologist Simultaneously

_{David Klinghoffer
April 3, 2021

Intelligent Design

1}

I had to laugh out loud at how Steve, in typical gentlemanly fashion, tied up these two critics of intelligent design in their own words. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 30, 2020

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, Against the Tide, atheism, biologists, debate, events, john lennox, Kevin Sorbo, mathematician, Oxford University, Richard Dawkins, Seattle, Stephen Meyer, The God Delusion, theaters, theists}

Against the Tide: Now Three Nights in November!

_{David Klinghoffer
October 30, 2020

Faith & Science

2}

The “God Delusion” debate between dueling Oxford scholars — biologist Richard Dawkins and mathematician John Lennox was a Sold Out show, and no wonder. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 29, 2020

Categories
Bioethics
Tagged
, Against the Tide, cancel culture, Christianity, Christopher Hitchens, Communism, debate, history, intellectuals, Iron Curtain, john lennox, Latin, Marxism, naturalism, Oxford University, pagans, Richard Dawkins, tolerance, universities}

Against the Tide: The Darkening Intellectual Scene

_{David Klinghoffer
October 29, 2020

Bioethics

4}

"Once you lose the kind of stabilizing influence of rational thought and respect," says John Lennox, "then you can end up with violence, as we have seen." Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 14, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, Bayes’ Theorem, Boston, debate, Evolution News, evolutionary biology, intelligent design, Oxford University, Peter Atkins, readers}

Welcome Back, Jonathan McLatchie, and Congratulations!

_{David Klinghoffer
July 14, 2020

Evolution

1}

As of January 2020, Jonathan M. is now Dr. Jonathan McLatchie. He earned a PhD in evolutionary biology from the Biosciences Institute at Newcastle University. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
February 26, 2020

Categories
Biology
Chemistry
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __edited, Adam and Eve, bacterial flagellum, bacteriophages, building blocks, chimpanzees, Darwin Devolves, debate, DNA, drive shaft, evolution, gears, Human, intelligent design, James Tour, methodological naturalism, molecular biology, motor, Mount Everest, Mount Rushmore, Neo-Darwinism, planthopper, propeller, Rice University, Richard Buggs, stator, Texas A&M, Veritas Forum}

Behe and Swamidass Debate Evolution and Intelligent Design at Texas A&M

_{Jonathan Witt
February 26, 2020

Biology, Chemistry, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

11}

When Michael Behe’s slide show flashed to a close up of the gears, a murmur of astonishment rolled through the audience. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 12, 2020

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __edited, Adam Sedgwick, Cambridge University, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, creationism, Darwin Day, Darwinian theory, debate, Debating Darwin's Doubt, evolution, football, free speech, Harvard University, Herman Bouma, ID the Future, intelligent design, John West, Jonathan Witt, Louis Agassiz, Michael Behe, National Science Teaching Association, On the Origin of Species, Sarah Chaffee, St. Louis, zoos}

Who Really Inherited Darwin’s Legacy? You Might Be Surprised to Learn

_{David Klinghoffer
February 12, 2020

Scientific Freedom

5}

Design scientists like Michael Behe have, in an important way, been following in Darwin’s path for decades. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
January 30, 2020

Categories
Faith & Science
Mathematics
Tagged
, __edited, a posteriori argument, a priori, Aeon, Albert Einstein, Aristotle, atheism, Big Bang, debate, faith, First Cause, general relativity, laws of physics, logic, marijuana, natural science, natural theology, New Atheism, Peter Atkins, science, Scripture, Singularity, Thomas Aquinas, University of Oxford, William Lane Craig}

Can Science Answer All the “Big” Questions?

_{Michael Egnor
January 30, 2020

Faith & Science, Mathematics

6}

Peter Atkins is right that science can answer the biggest question we can ask. His problem is that he doesn’t like the answer science provides. Read More ›