Tag: positive case for design | Page 3 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 23, 2012

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, positive case for design}

Responding to the Challenge that Intelligent Design Lacks a “Mechanism”

_{Casey Luskin
May 23, 2012

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Apart from the occasional mutation, we often think of the information in DNA as static, like a read-only CD-ROM. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 20, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __edited, "teach the controversy", Darwinism, positive case for design}

Revisiting the Positive Case for Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
April 20, 2012

Intelligent Design, Science Education

5}

If teachers are allowed to critique evolution, then in doing so aren't they teaching intelligent design? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 14, 2012

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Education
Tagged
, __k-review, bacterial flagella, Cambrian Explosion, intelligent design, peer review, positive case for design, science}

At North Dakota State University, Presenting the Positive Case for Design

_{Casey Luskin
February 14, 2012

Intelligent Design, Science Education

4}

Two issues of note dominated the Q&A: the Type III Secretory System (T3SS) as a supposed evolutionary precursor to the bacterial flagellum, and whether the Cambrian explosion really was an actual event in the history of life. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 27, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Legal Science (jurisprudence)
Tagged
, __k-review, Discovery Institute, Dover trial, intelligent design, Judge John E. Jones, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, positive case for design}

It’s Time for Some Folks to Get Over Dover

_{Casey Luskin
December 27, 2011

Intelligent Design, Legal Science (jurisprudence)

4}

The Kitzmiller v. Dover case, venerated each year by the Darwin faithful on the decision's December 20 anniversary, gave an easy out to critics who were hoping for a convenient way to dismiss intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 26, 2011

Categories
Science Reporting
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, Dover trial, intelligent design, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, positive case for design}

Circumventing the Post-Dover Media Blackout

_{Casey Luskin
December 26, 2011

Science Reporting, Scientific Freedom

3}

Just before the 2005 Dover case started, the Columbia Journalism Review published an article suggesting that the pro-ID viewpoint should not be fairly represented in the news media. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 24, 2011

Categories
Science Education
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, Dover trial, intelligent design, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, peer review, positive case for design, Research}

Post-Dover Education Victories for Intelligent Design

_{Casey Luskin
December 24, 2011

Science Education, Scientific Freedom

8}

The post-Dover narrative favored by the Darwin Lobby has it that ID's education policies were defeated, and it's been nothing but loss after loss for us ever since. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
December 23, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, chance, Discovery Institute, intelligent design, peer review, positive case for design, probability, Research, William A. Dembski}

How Bright is the Future of Intelligent Design?

_{Casey Luskin
December 23, 2011

Intelligent Design

10}

The past 5 to 10 years have been a boom period for pro-ID scientific research and peer-reviewed scientific publications. Read More ›

Digital seamless mathematical formulas. Abstract digital futuristic background with math, physics symbols and mesh network grid. 3D illustration in 4K science concept

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
October 14, 2011

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, defining terms, demarcation criteria, evidence for id, experimental science, hypothesis, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, NAS, National Academy of Sciences, observations, positive case for design, scientific theory, specified information, theory}

How Do We Know Intelligent Design Is a Scientific “Theory”?

_{Casey Luskin
October 14, 2011

Intelligent Design, Philosophy of Science

7}

Let's take the definition of "theory" given by ID's most eminent scientific critics, and if ID meets that definition then there's a good bet ID may properly be considered a scientific theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
September 10, 2011

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, biological information, BioLogos, Dennis Venema, positive case for design, theistic evolution}

What Is a Proper Test of Intelligent Design?

_{Casey Luskin
September 10, 2011

Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Unfortunately, his misunderstandings lead Dennis Venema to set up an inaccurate method of testing of ID. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 2, 2011

Categories
Science Reporting
Scientific Reasoning
Tagged
, __nedited, ad hoc hypotheses, argument from analogy, Cambrian Explosion, common ancestry, common descent, DNA, evidence for id, Forbes, John Farrell, Medieval science, methodological naturalism, misrepresentation, natural philosophy, nested hierarchy, positive case for design, Response to Criticism, sequence hypothesis, straw man, Tree of Life}

Who Misrepresented Who? A Response to John Farrell

_{Casey Luskin
April 2, 2011

Science Reporting, Scientific Reasoning

15}

When we find re-usage of parts in a way that cannot be explained by a phylogenetic tree and common descent, this is the sort of data we might expect under intelligent design. Read More ›