Tag: Darwin’s Doubt | Page 6 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Richard Weikart

Date
July 13, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, African Americans, Africans, Allison Hopper, alt-right, anti-Semitism, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, Evangelical Christians, evolution, James Watson, Jews, Muslims, Nobel Prize, Racism, Scientific American, Stephen Meyer, The Descent of Man, white supremacy}

Is “Denying Evolution” a Form of White Supremacy?

_{Richard Weikart
July 13, 2021

Evolution

4}

What happens if we examine the real white supremacists today? Are they creationists? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
June 12, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, abominable mystery, animal phyla, Big Bangs, Cambrian Explosion, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, discontinuity, Ediacaran fauna, evolutionary biologists, fossil record, paleontologists, Princeton University Press, Stephen Meyer, U.S. National Academy of Sciences}

Darwin’s “Abominable Mystery” Is Not Alone: Gaps Everywhere!

_{Günter Bechly
June 12, 2021

Evolution

5}

There is clearly a pattern of discontinuities that requires an adequate explanation, and Darwinism is not it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 4, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Tagged
, Cambridge University, Charles Darwin, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinian theory, Discovery Institute Press, Final Solution, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Jacques Barzun, Karl Marx, Michael Flannery, Nazi Germany, New York Times, purpose, Return of the God Hypothesis, Richard Wagner, Richard Weikart, Signature in the Cell, Soviet Union, Stephen Meyer, The Descent of Man, The Restoration of Man}

Recognizing the “Transformative” Impact of Barzun’s Darwin, Marx, Wagner, Eighty Years Later

_{David Klinghoffer
June 4, 2021

Bioethics

4}

Literary critic M. D. Aeschliman sketches the intellectual evolution that connects Barzun with later Darwin critics. The latest is Stephen Meyer. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 3, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, BioLogos, bones, Brian Miller, Cell (journal), common design, Darrel Falk, Darwin's Doubt, evolution, front-loaded design, Gerd Müller, homologous features, homology, intelligent design, mutations, Neil Shubin, Neo-Darwinism, novelty, phenotype, Return of the God Hypothesis, zebrafish}

Revealing Darrel Falk’s Overstatements about Limb Bones in Fish Fins

_{Casey Luskin
June 3, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

17}

The interpretation of the results as showing “latent” genetic capabilities has teleological overtones that are compatible with intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
June 1, 2021

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, amino-acid sequences, Ann Gauger, BioLogos, Brian Miller, Caltech, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Darrel Falk, Darwin's Doubt, David Snoke, Douglas Axe, Eric Davidson, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary creation, gene regulatory networks, genes, intelligent design, Michael Behe, population genetics, protein folds, proteins, purifying selection, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theistic evolution}

Darrel Falk’s Volte-Face on the Cambrian Explosion

_{Casey Luskin
June 1, 2021

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

14}

I appreciate that Dr. Falk and his colleagues at BioLogos would like to engage in a productive “dialogue” with proponents of intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 6, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Bilateria, biological complexity, body plans, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Charles Marshall, Darwin's Doubt, eLife, Eumetazoa, gene regulatory networks, genes, genetic information, Hoover Institution, Hox genes, Larry Moran, Metazoa, multiverse, Nature Communications, neo-Darwinian theory, paleontology, Peter Robinson, Planulozoa, Response to Criticism, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stanford University, Stephen Meyer, U.C. Berkeley, Uncommon Knowledge, University of Toronto}

Did the Origin of Animals Require New Genes?

_{Casey Luskin
May 6, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

14}

Materialists who purport to explain the origin of nature's complexity by smuggling in information unwittingly demonstrate the need for intelligent design. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
April 8, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Australia, Charles Marshall, codons, Darwin on Trial, Darwin's Doubt, evolutionary theory, genetic code, intelligent design, Last Universal Common Ancestor, LUCA, Michael Yarus, paleontologists, Phillip E. Johnson, protein translation, ribosomes, RNA world, Science (journal), U.C. Berkeley, University of Chicago}

Charles Marshall: Origin of Life Could Have Happened “Millions of Times”

_{Paul Nelson
April 8, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

Charles Marshall at U.C. Berkeley represents establishment opinion in current evolutionary theory, and for good reason. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
April 8, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, arthropods, Cambrian Explosion, Cambrian News, Charles Darwin, China, Darwin's Doubt, David Gelernter, Dickinsonia, Ediacaran animals, Ediacaran organisms, Evolution News, evolutionists, fungus, glide symmetry, Gregory Retallack, Ilya Bobrovskiy, Mongolia, Namibia, Neo-Darwinism, Peaceful Science, Science (journal), Stephen Meyer, University of Zurich, Vendobionta, Yale University}

The Cambrian Explosion Has Just Gone Nuclear

_{Günter Bechly
April 8, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

7}

Here are two very interesting updates to my recent articles on alleged Ediacaran animals and the Cambrian Explosion. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
March 12, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, cosmic fine-tuning, Darwin's Doubt, faith, intelligent design, personal God, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Stephen Meyer, theism, universe}

Stephen Meyer: Why You Should Pre-Order Return of the God Hypothesis Now

_{David Klinghoffer
March 12, 2021

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

2}

By enlarging his scope to include the origin of the universe, Meyer reveals why science confirms not merely a generic design in nature but a personal God. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 3, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, Darwin's Doubt, Return of the God Hypothesis, Signature in the Cell, Zoom}

Early Praise for Meyer’s Return of the God Hypothesis — And a Preorder Offer

_{David Klinghoffer
February 3, 2021

Faith & Science

1}

Meyer's latest "makes a strong case for the identity of the designer as a personal God," says University of Georgia biochemist Russell Carlson. Read More ›