Category: Genetics | Page 11 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 21, 2021

Categories
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, DNA, genome, Human Genome Project, intelligent design, junk DNA, lncRNAs, medicine, Nature (journal), non-coding DNA, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences}

Noncoding “Junk” DNA Is Important for Limb Formation

_{Casey Luskin
May 21, 2021

Genetics, Intelligent Design

5}

Some defenders of evolutionary orthodoxy would have us believe that we’ve only found a handful of non-coding DNA sequences that have function. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
April 21, 2021

Categories
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Zoology
Tagged
, angiosperms, Cambrian Explosion, carnivorous plants, Charles Darwin, convergence, creator, Darwinists, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, logos, Marcos Eberlin, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Mexico, Michael Behe, mousetrap, Neo-Darwinism, paleontology, Second Law of Thermodynamics, United States, University of Bonn, Utricularia, Wistar Symposium, Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig}

Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig: An Intelligent Design Pioneer

_{Granville Sewell
April 21, 2021

Genetics, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences, Zoology

6}

Darwinism sounds superficially plausible until one looks at real plants and animals with their irreducibly complex details. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

Date
April 14, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, Alan Feduccia, Archaeopteryx, birds, cladistics, Darwinian theory, dinosaurs, Dollo’s Law, Eocene, Ernst Mayr, evolutionary theory, genetic code, gradualism, Irreducible Complexity, M.-P. Schützenberger, macromutations, mutations, nucleotides, paleontology, phenotype, saltations, Science (journal), wings}

Ten Reasons Why Birds Are Not Living Dinosaurs

_{Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig
April 14, 2021

Evolution, Genetics

5}

Natural selection can explain “the survival of the fittest but not the arrival of the fittest.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Granville Sewell

Date
April 13, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, Darwinism, English, evolutionary theory, genes, German, intelligent design, interview, Italian, Marco Respinti, Max Planck Institute, Michael Behe, mutations, radiation, scientists, selection, Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig}

A New Interview with Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig

_{Granville Sewell
April 13, 2021

Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences

2}

To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
January 25, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Genetics
Tagged
, abortion, cattle, Center on Human Exceptionalism, Discovery Institute, economics, eugenics, Jay Richards, law, Politicians, scientists, specialists, Wesley J. Smith}

The Arrogant Mistake that Is Scientism

_{Jonathan Witt
January 25, 2021

Bioethics, Ethics, Genetics

2}

The tweet reads, “Imagine a world is ruled by scientists, not by politicians.” The drift of the tweet appeared to be, wouldn’t that be wonderful! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
October 18, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Darwinian evolution, Darwinism, evolution, ID the Future, paradigm shift, podcast, Science, The Miracle of the Cell}

Michael Denton: When Paradigms Shifts

_{Science & Culture
October 18, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Genetics, Intelligent Design

1}

Dr. Denton reflects on paradigm shifts that he’s witnessed, how his own thinking has changed, and how these shifts challenge Darwinian evolution in new ways. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Richard Sternberg

Date
April 3, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __k-review, axioms, chromosomes, DNA, Drosophila melanogaster, Francis Crick, fruit flies, junk DNA, Leslie Orgel, nucleus, organism, phenotype, Richard Dawkins, RNA, The Selfish Gene, transposable elements, W. Ford Doolittle, Y chromosome}

The “Why” of the Fly “Y”: Reflections on “Junk” DNA

_{Richard Sternberg
April 3, 2020

Evolution, Genetics

7}

Let us give some thought to the Y chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, that engaging fly which is the bond-servant of genetics. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 11, 2020

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, __edited, Ann Gauger, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Thaxton, Douglas Axe, evolution, genes, ID the Future, Illustra Media, junk DNA, Metazoa, natural selection, Nature Communications, non-coding DNA, orphan genes, Paul Nelson, probability, Roger Olsen, The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Trinity College Dublin, Walter Bradley}

Researchers: It Exists; Therefore, It Evolved

_{Science & Culture
March 11, 2020

Biology, Evolution, Genetics

8}

According to some reporters and Darwinists, evolutionary theory today needs no more confirmation than existence. Evolution is a fact, remember? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Flannery

Date
March 4, 2020

Categories
Genetics
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Philosophy of Science
Tagged
, __nedited, Auguste Comte, biological systems, cryo-electron microscopy, Darwin on Trial, Darwin's Black Box, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, history of id, intelligent design, logical positivism, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Michael Polanyi, molecular biology, Neo-Darwinism, Pajaro Dunes, Phillip E. Johnson, scientific reductionism}

What Precipitated the Intelligent Design Movement?

_{Michael Flannery
March 4, 2020

Genetics, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Philosophy of Science

3}

Here are some thoughts prompted by a rather curious question posed to me in an email, namely, “What were the findings that most helped ID since the turn of the millennium?” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 19, 2020

Categories
Bioethics
Ethics
Genetics
Tagged
, __edited, abortion, alphabet soup, atheism, China, Darwinism, eugenics, human beings, intelligent design, John Zmirak, materialism, morality, pregnancy, Richard Dawkins, The Stream, unborn, William Shakespeare}

But Why Not Go For It with Human Eugenics?

_{David Klinghoffer
February 19, 2020

Bioethics, Ethics, Genetics

3}

“It’s my opinion” is not a strong ground on which to take a moral stand. Read More ›