Category: Evolution | Page 234 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
April 26, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Alfred Russel Wallace, Artificial Selection, bacteria, Charles Darwin, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's House of Cards, Darwinism, Escherichia coli, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, Long Term Evolutionary Experiment, Matti Leisola, Michael Behe, mind, mutations, natural selection, nature, On the Origin of Species, organisms, PLOS Biology, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Tom Bethell, yeast}

Fake Darwinism in an International Test of Experimental Evolution

_{Science and Culture
April 26, 2019

Evolution

8}

It’s fine to search through random results for an outcome you’re aiming for. Just don’t call it Darwinian evolution. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Kirk Durston

Date
April 25, 2019

Categories
Cosmology
Evolution
Faith & Science
Tagged
, __k-review, Andrei Linde, Bernard Carr, Charles Darwin, Christianity, Craig Venter, Darwinism, DNA, Eugene Koonin, experimental science, fantasy, fantasy science, George Ellis, inferential science, Joe Silk, molecular machines, multiverse, nature, North America, Ockham’s razor, proteins, RNA replication, Roger Penrose, Sabine Hossenfelder, science, science fiction, scientism}

On Fantasy in Modern Science

_{Kirk Durston
April 25, 2019

Cosmology, Evolution, Faith & Science

9}

An attribute of a good sci-fi story is that it should open new vistas for the imagination while, at the same time, not requiring the reader to put up with the preposterous. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 24, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, Cambrian News, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute, Eric Metaxas, evolutionary biology, fossil record, Gerd B. Müller, James Tour, Jay Richards, MIT Press, Neo-Darwinism, Rice University, Stephen Meyer, Stuart A. Newman}

Müller Report: Meyer on an Evolutionist’s Indictment of Evolution, and More

_{David Klinghoffer
April 24, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

3}

It’s another illustration of how the increasingly recognized inadequacies of materialist origins theories have failed to be reported to the general public. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Mathematics
Tagged
, __k-review, Andrew McDiarmid, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, genes, ID the Future, Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe, natural selection, podcast, random mutation, unguided evolution}

Behe on Darwinism’s “Socially Inherited Dependence on Classical Yet Irrelevant Math”

_{David Klinghoffer
April 23, 2019

Evolution, Mathematics

1}

Professor Behe traces the errant thinking to an outdated mathematical picture taken from Ronald Fisher and his 1930 book, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Africa, anole lizards, arctic tern, birds, carbohydrate, cichlid fish, Darwin Devolves, dinosaurs, driver, evolution, finches, flightless cormorant, flightlessness, Galápagos Islands, glacier, global warming, Gondwana, Hawaii, honeycreepers, mass extinction, Michael Behe, migration, New Zealand, PNAS}

Despite Dozens of Authors, PNAS Paper Fails to Explain Bird Evolution

_{Science and Culture
April 23, 2019

Evolution

6}

They reason backwards: Birds evolved, therefore some poorly understood mindless processes must have driven them to evolve. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 22, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Origin of Life
Tagged
, __k-review, abiogenesis, Dallas Conference on Science and Faith, Discovery Institute, James Tour, nanotechnology, Rice University, scientists, synthetic chemistry}

Chemist James Tour Is Scathing, Hilarious: “Show Me the Chemistry” of Abiogenesis. “It’s Not There.”

_{David Klinghoffer
April 22, 2019

Evolution, Origin of Life

2}

Professor Tour is without parallel. Truly, I’d love to hear from our materialist critics how they would answer any of this. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 21, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, abiogenesis, Ann Gauger, cells, Discovery Institute, DNA, ID the Future, intelligent design, library, podcast, transcription, translation}

Inside the Cell: DNA as a Library

_{Science and Culture
April 21, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

And just think, it all arose by chance, blind, mindless processes alone, didn’t it? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 19, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, 3D printing, abiogenesis, computer, evolution, Granville Sewell, reward, self-replication}

Announcing New Sewell Prize in Biological Origins Studies!

_{David Klinghoffer
April 19, 2019

Evolution

2}

It sets a fascinating challenge but offers an enviable reward. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 18, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Neuroscience & Mind
Tagged
, __k-review, Bradley Center, computers, Dallas, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, future, George Gilder, Jay Richards, machines, meat machines, Robert J. Marks II, robots}

Richards: False Prophecies of a Robotic Future Are Based on a False Darwinian Premise

_{David Klinghoffer
April 18, 2019

Evolution, Neuroscience & Mind

2}

The rejoinder to this way of thinking, which Jay Richards expresses with wonderful concision, is that humans possess a unique capacity forever setting us apart from machines. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
April 17, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, bacteria, Current Biology, Darwin Devolves, DNA repair, E. coli, evolution, fungi, HGT, honeybees, horizontal gene transfer, hybridization, ID the Future, introgression, Michael Behe, microbiome, mutations, PLOS Biology, PNAS, radiation, RNA polymerase, Stanford University, Taiwan, University of Barcelona}

Testing Behe’s Principle that Darwin Devolves

_{Science and Culture
April 17, 2019

Evolution

9}

We looked at some papers claiming to see evolution happening in real time, to see if natural selection has actually invented a new function, or just broke an existing function. Read More ›