randomness

Robert Marks: Randomness and the Enigma of Creativity

The Law of Zero Magic

Intelligent Design in the Dirt

Cancer Research Delivers Stark Reminder to Evolutionists
“Darwin’s Dice” — Michael Flannery on the Role of Chance in Darwinian Evolution
In Terror of Chipmunks: A Response to Joseph Felsenstein

Seeking an Official Definition of “Randomness”: A Reply to Jay Richards

What’s in a Word? “Randomness” in Darwinism and the Scientific Theory of Evolution
Dr. Steven Novella’s Challenge: “Prove Me Wrong, Egnor”!
Dogmatic materialist Dr. Steven Novella, assistant professor of neurology at Yale, president and co-founder of the New England Skeptical Society, and my interlocutor in an ongoing debate on the mind-brain problem, has issued a challenge to me regarding his theory that the mind is caused entirely by matter:
Prove me wrong, Egnor.
A bit of background helps explain Dr. Novella’s pique. In an earlier post arguing for a pure materialist understanding of the mind, Dr. Novella made this astonishing claim:
The materialist hypothesis – that the brain causes consciousness – has made a number of predictions, and every single prediction has been validated. Every single question that can be answered scientifically – with observation and evidence – that takes the form: “If the brain causes the mind then…” has been resolved in favor of that hypothesis.
I noted:
A bit of advice: whenever a scientist says of his own theory that “every single prediction has been validated,” you’re being had. No scientific theory has had “every single prediction” validated. All theories accord with evidence in some ways, and are inconsistent in others. Successful scientific theories prevail on the preponderance of the evidence, not validation of “every single prediction.” Real science lacks the precision of ideology.
Dr. Novella replied:
Read More ›





































