Tag: National Review | Page 4 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
May 14, 2019

Categories
Biology
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __cedited, atheism, Charles Darwin, conservatism, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, infanticide, J.B.S. Haldane, Jerry Coyne, John Maynard Smith, Joseph Stalin, National Review, Northwestern University, On the Origin of Species, Politics, Razib Khan, Richard Lenski, Sigmund Freud, Stephen Jay Gould, Steven Pinker}

Déjà Vu at National Review

_{Michael Behe
May 14, 2019

Biology, Science Reporting

6}

Some guy once wrote that there’s nothing new under the sun. He must have had political conservatives’ pro-Darwin arguments in mind. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Paul Nelson

Date
May 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __cedited, Ben Stein, conservatives, Darwin Devolves, evolution, Expelled (movie), fear, Michael Behe, National Review, nature, Razib Khan, Western civilization}

I Don’t “Fear” Evolution

_{Paul Nelson
May 14, 2019

Evolution, Science Reporting

2}

Khan’s unspoken corollary: anyone who expresses skepticism about evolution is an enemy of civilization. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, atheism, Ben Shapiro, Charles Darwin, conservatism, culture, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, David Gelernter, Declaration of Independence, evolution, Jerry Coyne, Judaism, Michael Behe, National Review, Razib Khan, Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, scientists, Stephen Meyer, The Claremont Review of Books, Tom Wolfe, Yuval Noah Harari}

The “Fearing Evolution” Trope

_{David Klinghoffer
May 14, 2019

Evolution

3}

Razib Khan explains why “evolutionary biology is nothing for conservatives to fear,” since “it is one of the crowning achievements of modern Western civilization.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 3, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __cedited, Charles Darwin, Christians, dentists, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, intelligent design, journalists, Kevin Williamson, Michael Behe, National Academy of Sciences, National Review, Nobel laureates, poets, Richard Lenski, Scientific Dissent from Darwin, The Quarterly Review of Biology, Wikipedia}

Science and Its Consequences: Kevin Williamson Versus Intelligent Design, Again

_{David Klinghoffer
April 3, 2019

Biochemistry, Science Reporting

5}

The question before us was whether anyone but journalists and other amateurs take the science of ID, “daft rube-bait” according to Kevin, seriously. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Sarah Chaffee

Date
January 31, 2019

Categories
Scientific Freedom
Tagged
, __cedited, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, David Klinghoffer, Douglas Axe, Eugene Koonin, Irreducible Complexity, Kevin Williamson, Lehigh University, molecular evolution, multiverse, National Academy of Sciences, National Institutes of Health, National Review, PNAS, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, Richard Sternberg, Scott Minnich, stem, Stephen Meyer, The Edge of Evolution, theoretical biology, University of Idaho}

When It Comes to Origins Science, Is PNAS Really “Ready When You Are”?

_{Sarah Chaffee
January 31, 2019

Scientific Freedom

6}

Kevin Williamson imagines that scientists are free to “slug it out” in journals and other academic settings, so that the truth reliably emerges. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 25, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, academic freedom, conservatism, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian theory, emotions, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, Michael Behe, National Review, Nature (journal), novelty, PNAS, Science (journal), Scott Minnich, University of Idaho, William F. Buckley Jr.}

Michael Behe’s Darwin Devolves — When You’re Ready to Think for Yourself

_{David Klinghoffer
January 25, 2019

Biochemistry, Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

The idea that scientists are like tribal elders, to be respected and never questioned, much less smirked at (God forbid), is one possible perspective. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
January 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __cedited, biologists, C.S. Lewis, conservatives, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, David Klinghoffer, evolution, intelligent design, James A. Shapiro, Jerry Coyne, John Milton, Kevin Williamson, logic, National Review, poetry, T.S. Eliot}

On Intelligent Design, Do Your Own Homework. Make Up Your Own Mind.

_{Michael Behe
January 23, 2019

Evolution

5}

C.S. Lewis encountered an objection to his literary criticism analogous to Kevin Williamson’s and explored its underlying logic. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 22, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __nedited, Cambrian Explosion, complexity, Darwinism, fact-checking, Gerd Müller, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, National Review, Neo-Darwinism, novelty, peer-reviewed, peer-reviewed literature, University of Vienna}

Self-Induced Blindness: Round 3 with Kevin Williamson

_{David Klinghoffer
January 22, 2019

Intelligent Design, Science Reporting

3}

Of course, an allergy to conceding error is not unique to ID opponents, but it is typical of them. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 21, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, careerism, credentialism, Darwinists, groupthink, H.L. Mencken, intelligent design, Kevin Williamson, National Review, scientists, William F. Buckley Jr.}

Intelligent Design as “Daft Rube-Bait”: Round 2 with Kevin Williamson

_{David Klinghoffer
January 21, 2019

Intelligent Design

2}

“He is saying that critics of Darwin should allow themselves to be abused — by non-scientists like Kevin Williamson — and just take it.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
January 16, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __cedited, Alfred Russel Wallace, Commentary, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwin's Doubt, Darwinism, Discovery Institute, education, evolution, Firing Line, Gertrude Himmelfarb, intelligent design, Irving Kristol, James A. Shapiro, Kevin Williamson, National Review, Phillip E. Johnson, Royal Society, Signature in the Cell, Texas, The Information Enigma, Tom Wolfe, Wesley Smith, Whittaker Chambers, William F. Buckley Jr.}

Kevin Williamson on Intelligent Design

_{David Klinghoffer
January 16, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

5}

No intellectually challenging idea has attracted more uninformed criticism than ID. Read More ›