Tag: Jonathan Bartlett

^{Type
post

Author
Emily Reeves

Date
February 3, 2025

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, adaptation, Ann Gauger, Brian Miller, Casey Luskin, cell wall, Douglas Axe, genetic variations, genomes, ionizing radiation, Jonathan Bartlett, Michael Behe, mutations, non-random mutation, organisms, Paul Nelson, phylogenetics, polymerases, population dynamics, random mutation, Stephen Meyer, Steve Laufmann, William A. Dembski, Winston Ewert}

Paper Digest: Addressing Flaws in Population Dynamic Models

_{Emily Reeves
February 3, 2025

Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

Reframing genetic variation as falling into separate categories — random and non-random — could provide new insights into the history of life. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 7, 2023

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, antibodies, directed mutations, ID the Future, Jonathan Bartlett, Jonathan McLatchie, mutations, podcast, random processes}

Jonathan Bartlett on the Growing Evidence of Designed Mutations

_{Science and Culture
March 7, 2023

Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Often a given biological system dramatically limits the search space of possible mutations in useful ways. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 23, 2021

Categories
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, aliens, Carl Sagan, Casey Luskin, chemical evolution, Cornell University, Curiosity rover, Darwinism, Enceladus, Francesco Redi, Jonathan Bartlett, Jonathan Lunine, Jonathan O’Callaghan, Louis Pasteur, maggots, Mars, methane, microbes, Mind Matters, New Scientist, phosphine, probabilistic resources, The Conversation, University of Arizona, University of Washington, Venus}

Methane Causes Space Aliens?

_{Science and Culture
July 23, 2021

Physical Sciences

8}

Recent sensational headlines give astute readers occasion to contrast valid scientific inferences from leaps of faith based on worldview assumptions. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 16, 2021

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, CELS 2021, Center for Science and Culture, Conference on Engineering in Living Systems, DNA, engineers, evolutionists, feedback loops, Jonathan Bartlett, junk DNA, logic gates, Mind Matters, Systems Biology}

What Biologists Can Learn from Engineers, and Vice Versa

_{David Klinghoffer
June 16, 2021

Biology, Intelligent Design

2}

If biologists had thought more like engineers, stumbling into the myth of "Junk DNA" might have been avoided. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 13, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, active information, BIO-Complexity, Daniel Andrés Díaz-Pachón, Darwinian evolution, E. coli, equilibrium, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, fitness landscape, genetic algorithms, genome, Jonathan Bartlett, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mathematician, Michael Behe, mutations, Richard Lenski, Robert J. Marks II, William A. Dembski}

New Papers Explore the Utility of Active Information

_{Casey Luskin
May 13, 2020

Evolution

7}

William Dembski and Robert J. Marks developed the concept of active information to measure the extent to which a search function appears pre-programmed to find some target. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 3, 2017

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Technology
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, antibodies, antigens, BIO-Complexity, evolution, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Bartlett, machines, Modern Synthesis, molecular machines, natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, proteins, Richard Dawkins, teleology, The Blind Watchmaker, The Selfish Gene}

Design (But Not Design) Is the New Unifying Principle of Biology

_{Science and Culture
December 3, 2017

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences, Technology

5}

The human eye is for seeing, whether or not it has any effect on genetics. However, this common-sense view has a problem. Read More ›