Tag: genes | Page 17 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Ann Gauger

Date
May 2, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, adaptation, amino acids, APOB, cholesterol, Darwin Devolves, diet, disease, evolution, function, genes, genome, genotype, mice, Michael Behe, mutations, phenotype, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, proteins, Shiping Liu, SNPs}

Remind Me Again Why We Picked Polar Bears?

_{Ann Gauger
May 2, 2019

Evolution

16}

The core difficulty for some scientists who read Michael Behe’s book is also the key idea at its heart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 23, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Mathematics
Tagged
, __k-review, Andrew McDiarmid, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, genes, ID the Future, Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe, natural selection, podcast, random mutation, unguided evolution}

Behe on Darwinism’s “Socially Inherited Dependence on Classical Yet Irrelevant Math”

_{David Klinghoffer
April 23, 2019

Evolution, Mathematics

1}

Professor Behe traces the errant thinking to an outdated mathematical picture taken from Ronald Fisher and his 1930 book, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 10, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, Arthur Hunt, Darwin Devolves, data, degradative mutations, devolution, function, genes, Jerry Coyne, Liu et al. (2014), Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Shiping Liu, webinar}

Polar Bear Seminar: A Fake Scandal About a Chart

_{Casey Luskin
April 10, 2019

Evolution

13}

The criticisms keep coming. It’s hard to keep up. Lents, in fact, just yesterday added additional commentary on Behe’s use of the chart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
April 9, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, algorithms, APOB, Arthur Hunt, Cell (journal), Darwin Devolves, genes, Liu et al. (2014), methodology, Michael Behe, mutations, Nathan Lents, Polar Bear Seminar, polar bears, PolyPhen-2, proteins, Shiping Liu}

Polar Bear Seminar: Unacknowledged Discrepancies, Inconsistent Standards

_{Casey Luskin
April 9, 2019

Evolution

9}

The discrepancy in method is crucial to understanding this argument against Behe. Yet curiously, it is omitted from mention by Lents and Hunt. Why? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 1, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, academic freedom, Bethlehem, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, devolution, dog breeds, Eric Metaxas, evolution, genes, humor, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Michael Denton, Pennsylvania, tenure, The Edge of Evolution}

Watch: Behe and Metaxas Talk Evolution, Design, Implications, and Academic Freedom

_{David Klinghoffer
April 1, 2019

Intelligent Design

3}

Metaxas is hilarious, and Behe has a fine sense of humor himself. They make the science in Professor Behe’s already accessible new book even more accessible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 29, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, bacteria, citrate, Darwin Devolves, E. coli, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, flexibility, Functional-Coded-elemenT, gain of function, genes, genetic information, hemoglobin, high fat diet, Long Term Evolution Experiment, loss of function, LTEE, MacArthur Fellow, mice, Michigan State University, mutations, National Academy of Sciences, polar bears, proteins, ribose operon, Richard Lenski, Telliamed Revisited, The Quarterly Review of Biology, Yersinia pestis}

Thanks, Professor Lenski, the LTEE Is Doing Great!

_{Michael Behe
March 29, 2019

Intelligent Design

11}

Lenski agrees that the beneficial mutations seen in his Long Term Evolution Experiment are overwhelmingly degradative or loss-of-function ones. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 26, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Amber Rice, ATP synthase, BackReaction, bacterial flagellum, biologists, cells, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian evolution, E. coli, Encyclopedia Britannica, Evolution (journal), fiber optic cables, genes, Greg Lang, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, James Clerk Maxwell, Lehigh University, Lost in Math, machines, molecular machines, Mr. Spock, Nature (journal), Nobel Prize, On the Origin of Species, organisms, planthopper, proteins, public opinion, Richard Lenski, Sabine Hossenfelder, scientists, yeast}

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 3

_{Michael Behe
March 26, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

15}

Perhaps the evidence for the vast scope of Darwin’s theory really isn’t as strong as biologists over the years have been telling each other. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 25, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, ALX1, Amber Rice, birds, birth defects, cichlid fish, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, Darwinian processes, Evolution (journal), evolutionary biologists, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, Galápagos finches, genes, Greg Lang, Lake Victoria, Lehigh University, mutations, nucleotides, Peter Grant, proteins, Rosemary Grant, Sangeet Lamichhaney, yeast}

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 2

_{Michael Behe
March 25, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

12}

Lang and Rice cite a number of articles to show that loss-of-function mutations are just a small minority of those found in studies of organisms. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
March 22, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Amber Rice, bacteria, citrate, Darwin Devolves, degradative mutations, DNA, DNA repair, Dogs, E. coli, evolution, Evolution (journal), First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, genes, glucose, Greg Lang, Journal of Molecular Evolution, laboratory, Lehigh University, Lenski lab, loss-of-function mutations, machines, malaria, microbes, nature, Plasmodium falciparum, polar bear, proteins, Richard Lenski, wooly mammoth, yeast}

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 1

_{Michael Behe
March 22, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

11}

Their review pretty much completely misses the mark. Nonetheless, it is a good illustration of how sincere-yet-perplexed professional evolutionary biologists view the data. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
March 15, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, antifreeze, atheism, Brown University, Cornelius Hunter, DNA, evolution, genes, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jerry Coyne, just-so stories, Kenneth Miller, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, Michael Behe, Monty Python, National Center for Science Education (NCSE), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, proteins, RNA, serendipity, University of Chicago, University of Illinois, Why Evolution Is True}

Jerry Coyne, Ken Miller Revive a “Fishy Story”

_{Science and Culture
March 15, 2019

Intelligent Design

7}

Coyne is sure this is going to come as a rude shock, to our colleague and contributor Dr. Behe in particular, “a slap in the face of IDers like Michael Behe — a fish slap like the one below.” Read More ›