Tag: biological machines

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
July 24, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, artificial intelligence, biological machines, Casey Luskin, Darwinian evolution, David Hullender, dogmatism, Neo-Darwinism, Olen Brown, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, self-assembly, strengths and weaknesses, University of Missouri, University of Texas}

Can AI Help Us Assess Neo-Darwinism?

_{Andrew McDiarmid
July 24, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

Casey Luskin unpacks three recent scientific papers warning that neo-Darwinism must be updated if it has any hope of surviving as a theory. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Egnor

Date
August 11, 2022

Categories
Neuroscience & Mind
Philosophy
Science
Tagged
, abstract thought, animals, arachnids, Aristotelianism, Aristotle, bacteria, bats, biological machines, cats, consciousness, Dogs, dreaming, dreams, flies, Franz Brentano, future, human beings, intentionality, justice, mental states, mind, PNAS, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, proton gradients, REM sleep, sensory organs, spiders, Thomas Nagel, viruses}

What Is It Like to Be a Spider?

_{Michael Egnor
August 11, 2022

Neuroscience & Mind, Philosophy, Science

10}

A recent research article from Germany has made quite a splash in the popular media and raises some very interesting questions about animal minds. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 31, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Linguistics
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Aristotle, autopoiesis, biological machines, co-option, epigenetics, intelligent design, Jim Madden, Kenneth Miller, meaning, Michael Behe, Pat Flynn, philosophers, Systems Biology, Thomas Aquinas}

Michael Behe on Meaning Detection in Language, and More

_{Science and Culture
July 31, 2021

Intelligent Design, Linguistics

1}

Intelligent design pioneer Michael Behe continues his conversation with philosophers Pat Flynn and Jim Madden. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
December 9, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, bacterial flagellum, biological machines, biological systems, Darwinism, ID the Future, Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe, mousetrap}

Michael Behe: Battle of the Mousetraps

_{Jonathan Witt
December 9, 2020

Evolution

1}

Behe used the common mousetrap to illustrate irreducible complexity, showing how various mechanical contrivances need all of their main parts to function. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
December 3, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, biological machines, Biomimetics, Charles Darwin, Christianity, compartmentalization, computational biology, evolution, evolutionary biologists, faith, human body, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Justin Brierley, Lutheran Church, medicine, moral argument, physicians, Richard Dawkins, S. Joshua Swamidass, Spokane WA, theistic evolution, Unbelievable}

A Physician Describes How Behe, and Intelligent Design, Changed His Mind

_{David Klinghoffer
December 3, 2020

Biochemistry, Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

5}

There’s no better tribute to the power of ideas than a changed mind. Erik Strandness is a physician in Spokane, WA, practicing neonatal medicine. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
November 19, 2020

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, atheism, biological machines, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinian mechanisms, Darwinists, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, mutations, New York Times, polar bears, scientists, webinar}

Vacuous Attacks from Brilliant Scientists: Behe Will Discuss in a Webinar, Saturday, November 21

_{Science and Culture
November 19, 2020

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

The Lehigh University biochemist haunts the dreams of Darwinists. Each of his three books sparked a firestorm of criticism. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
September 8, 2020

Categories
Faith & Science
Tagged
, "leap of faith", Abraham, Apostle Paul, Bill Gates, biological machines, Christianity, Darwinism, deism, evolutionary theory, Genesis, Howard J. Van Till, intelligent design, Johannes Kepler, Judaism, microscopes, Microsoft, miracles, modern science, omnipotence, Psalms, Revelation (book of), Romans, theism, theistic evolution}

Theistic Darwinism’s “Fully Gifted” Creation Theology Contradicts Itself, and Science

_{Jonathan Witt
September 8, 2020

Faith & Science

10}

Theistic evolutionists treat God as time-bound when it suits their argument, and beyond time when it suits their argument. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Steve Laufmann

Date
June 6, 2016

Categories
Biology
Engineering
Tagged
, __tedited, analogy, bioengineering, biological machines, biomimicry, coordination, design constraint, design framework, interdisciplinary, optimization, reverse-engineering, system of systems, Systems Biology, systems engineering, worldview}

Foundational Question: Is Biology Engineering?

_{Steve Laufmann
June 6, 2016

Biology, Engineering

9}

Look at the photo at the top of this post, and ask yourself: What's the best-engineered object in view? Read More ›