Tag: sophistry

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
June 23, 2022

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Mathematics
Origin of Life
Tagged
, Darwinian processes, Darwinism, evolution, formalism, Guide to Reading Jason Rosenhouse (series), improbability, intelligent design, Jason Rosenhouse, mathematician, probability, protein space, proteins, sophistry, statistics}

Darwinist Turns Math Cop: Track 1 and Track 2

_{William A. Dembski
June 23, 2022

Evolution, Intelligent Design, Mathematics, Origin of Life

7}

Jason Rosenhouse insists that intelligent design proponents obey his rules, but happily flouts them himself. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Wesley J. Smith

Date
June 16, 2022

Categories
Bioethics
Science Reporting
Tagged
, activists, animal rights, animals, Bronx Zoo, children, crime, duties, elephants, Happy (elephant), human rights, humans, illness, injury, judges, New York State, Nonhuman Rights Project, people, rights, slaves, sophistry, women, writ of habeas corpus}

Court Rules Elephant Does Not Have Rights

_{Wesley J. Smith
June 16, 2022

Bioethics, Science Reporting

4}

I have written here several times about the attempt by the Nonhuman Rights Project (NHRP) to “break the species barrier.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
September 16, 2016

Categories
Foundations
Tagged
, __tedited, science journalism, scientism, sophistry, trust in scientists}

Science, Scientism, and the “Intellectual Yet Idiot”

_{David Klinghoffer
September 16, 2016

Foundations

4}

Nassim Nicholas Taleb, of Black Swan fame, offers a wonderful and insightful tirade. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Robert L. Crowther, II

Date
September 13, 2006

Categories
Science Reporting
Tagged
, __edited, Dover, Judge Jones, Michael Behe, sophistry}

Darwin or Design? Resolving the Conflict, Sept. 29, USF Sun Dome

_{Robert Crowther
September 13, 2006

Science Reporting

1}

Two of the leading skeptics of Darwin’s theory of evolution will be appearing at a major event in Florida on September 29.

Judge Jones Exposes Sorry State of Legal Practice

_{Logan Paul Gage
September 13, 2006

Science Reporting

1}

Every American should be troubled by this statement by a federal judge:

I think that some of the cross-examination was absolutely fabulous,” said Jones. “It will endure, and I think it will be excerpted for advocacy classes. … I would say, in particular, Eric Rothschild’s cross-examination of Professor [Michael] Behe — the intelligent design proponent — that might be as good a cross-examination of an expert witness as I have ever seen. It was textbook. (quoted in Pennsylvania Lawyer, July/August, 2006)