Tag: Rutgers University | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 18, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, bacteria, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, Darwinian evolution, Dr. Dan, errors, foresight, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, recognition, recycling, repair, ribosomes, Rutgers University}

DNA Repair and the Origin of Life: Here’s the Problem

_{David Klinghoffer
June 18, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Perhaps out there, watching along with you, is another Professor Dan Stern Cardinale who is imagining how easy it’s going to be to take this one apart. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Andrew McDiarmid

Date
June 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, Dr. Dan, evolution, function, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan McLatchie, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, podcast, Rutgers University}

Casey Luskin Reflects on His Recent Junk DNA Debate

_{Andrew McDiarmid
June 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

For decades we were told that non-coding regions of our DNA are littered with evolutionary junk. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 24, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, Discovery Institute, DNA, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, ERVs, Evolution News, function, genome, junk DNA, Nature (journal), pseudogenes, repetitive DNA, RNA, Rutgers University, YouTube channels}

Did Dr. Dan Make Us Change Our Position on Junk DNA?

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 24, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

13}

This claim is totally false and it perhaps reflects Dr. Dan’s wish to find a positive spin on the substance of what happened during the debate. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 16, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, cell types, Creation Myths, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, Dr. Dan, ENCODE, evolution, function, genome, Hox genes, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, lncRNAs, non-coding DNA, non-coding RNAs, Richard Sternberg, RNA, Rutgers University, scientific literature}

Reflections on Casey Luskin’s Debate with “Dr. Dan”

_{Jonathan McLatchie
May 16, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

I commend Dr. Dan for being an amicable dialogue partner and for his good faith attempt to engage substantively with the relevant scientific issues. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan McLatchie

Date
May 13, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debates, DNA, dog, Dr. Dan, embryogenesis, embryonic stem cells, enzymes, evolution, function, genome, humans, intelligent design, junk DNA, methylation, mouse, Nature (journal), non-coding RNAs, peer-reviewed literature, repetitive elements, Rutgers University, Science (journal), transposable elements}

From the “Junk DNA” Files: Can “Degraded” LINE Elements Still Be Functional?

_{Jonathan McLatchie, Richard Sternberg, and Casey Luskin
May 13, 2024

Evolution, Intelligent Design

22}

On May 2, Casey Luskin had an online debate with Professor Daniel Stern Cardinale, an evolutionary biologist at Rutgers University. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 6, 2024

Categories
Botany
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, cancer, Casey Luskin, Dan Stern Cardinale, design detection, Discovery Institute, Engineering Research Group, function, human genome, human origins, ID 3.0, intelligent design, junk DNA, Research, researchers, Rutgers University, waiting-time problem}

Two Measures of Intelligent Design’s Advance: Peer-Reviewed Publications and ID 3.0

_{David Klinghoffer
May 6, 2024

Botany, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

It’s a talking point for evolutionists that in the past two decades, intelligent design has stalled. Hardly! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 3, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, agnostics, biologists, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evidence, evolution, evolutionists, functionality, geologists, human genome, intelligent design, John Mattick, junk DNA, Rutgers University, scientists, YouTube channels}

Casey Luskin Versus Dan Stern Cardinale: A Wonderful Debate About “Junk DNA”

_{David Klinghoffer
May 3, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

Everyone did a great job, and the conversation was science-packed from beginning to end. Not one word of invective, and indeed highly cordial. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
May 2, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Dan Stern Cardinale, debates, evolution, evolutionists, function, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, peer-reviewed literature, Rutgers University}

“Junk DNA” from Three Perspectives: Some Key Quotes

_{Casey Luskin
May 2, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

19}

Many of these quotes are from mainstream scientific papers, books, or book chapters of a technical nature. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Richard Sternberg

Date
May 1, 2024

Categories
Evolution
Genetics
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Daniel Stern Cardinale, debate, DNA, Endogenous retroviruses, evolution, evolutionary history, function, genome, human genome, intelligent design, introns, junk DNA, non-coding DNA, peer-reviewed, persistent scientific errors, pseudogenes, repetitive DNA, RNA, Rutgers University, transposons}

Here’s a Far from Exhaustive (Yet Still Exhausting) List of Papers Discovering Function for “Junk” DNA

_{Richard Sternberg, Jonathan McLatchie, and Casey Luskin
May 1, 2024

Evolution, Genetics

143}

The list contains over 800 papers which are divided into categories according to the type of genetic element for which they focus on finding function. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 1, 2024

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Creation Myths, Dan Stern Cardinale, debate, Discovery Institute, evolution, genome, human genome, intelligent design, junk DNA, Long Story Short, misrepresentation, Rutgers University, The Codes of Life, YouTubers}

Debate: Casey Luskin Versus Rutgers Biologist Dan Cardinale, Thursday, May 2

_{David Klinghoffer
May 1, 2024

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

Okay, this should be interesting. The question up for discussion: "Is the Human Genome Largely Junk DNA?" Read More ›