Tag: Michael Behe | Page 24 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Brian Miller

Date
August 23, 2021

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, CELS 2021, Conference on Engineering in Living Systems, DNA, emergence, evolutionary mechanism, intelligent design, Michael Behe, proteins, Reductionism, Stephen Meyer, Systems Biology}

End of the Road for the Intelligent Design Debate?

_{Brian Miller
August 23, 2021

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

A key question is how long biologists can argue that life looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but it is actually a cat. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 9, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, “consensus science”, atheism, cognition, computer scientists, consciousness, Darwinism, David Gelernter, intelligent design, materialism, Michael Behe, mind, Mind and Cosmos, neo-Darwinian theory, philosophers, Princeton University, Public Discourse, Stephen Meyer, Thomas Nagel}

Little Book, Big Waves — Nagel’s Mind and Cosmos, Nine Years Later

_{David Klinghoffer
August 9, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

As a colleague points out, Nagel's departure from the “right-thinking consensus” is on a par with David Gelernter’s 2019 farewell to Darwinism. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
August 4, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Biology
Evolution
Human Origins and Anthropology
Tagged
, atheism, Darwin Devolves, Darwinism, evolution, evolutionary theory, human origins, Human Zoos, John Jay College, John West, Michael Behe, missing links, Nathan Lents, Nazis, Newspeak, pseudoscience, Racism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), St. Louis, St. Louis World's Fair, Washington University}

Biologist: It’s “Racist” to Invite Condemnation of Racism

_{David Klinghoffer
August 4, 2021

Bioethics, Biology, Evolution, Human Origins and Anthropology

6}

Organizers of the St. Louis World’s Fair believed human zoos would “shed light on the theory evolved by Darwin as regards the evolution of the human race.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 1, 2021

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, "poor design", academic freedom, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Pat Flynn, philosophers, Thomists}

Michael Behe: What About “Bad” Designs in Biology? And Other Questions

_{Science & Culture
August 1, 2021

Biology, Intelligent Design

1}

Also in the mix, the issue of academic pressure to distance oneself from ID, even before those involved understand what the theory actually is. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 31, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Linguistics
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Aristotle, biological machines, co-option, epigenetics, intelligent design, Kenneth Miller, meaning, Michael Behe, Pat Flynn, philosophers, Systems Biology, Thomas Aquinas}

Michael Behe on Meaning Detection in Language, and More

_{Science & Culture
July 31, 2021

Intelligent Design, Linguistics

1}

Intelligent design pioneer Michael Behe continues his conversation with philosophers Pat Flynn and Jim Madden. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
William A. Dembski

Date
July 28, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Medicine
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, coordination, CRISPR, Darwinian evolution, ENCODE, Encyclopedia of DNA Elements, Ferrari, Francis Collins, gene editing, George Church, germ line, humans, intelligence, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, John West, Journal of Theoretical Biology, junk DNA, Michael Behe, natural history, natural selection, predictions, Richard Dawkins, The Greatest Show on Earth, The Language of God}

An ID Prediction for CRISPR Gene Editing

_{William A. Dembski
July 28, 2021

Intelligent Design, Medicine

12}

From an design perspective, there is no compelling reason to think that CRISPR gene editing will constitute an enhancement tool for building superior humans. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 27, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Philosophy
Tagged
, A Mousetrap for Darwin, Aquinas’ Fifth Way, Darwin Devolves, ID the Future, Lehigh University, Michael Behe, Pat Flynn, philosophers, podcast, Science, Thomas Aquinas}

Biologist Michael Behe Tangles with Two Philosophers

_{Science & Culture
July 27, 2021

Intelligent Design, Philosophy

1}

Pat Flynn and Jim Madden press Behe with objections — some philosophic, others scientific — to see how well his position stands up to scrutiny. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
July 14, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Medicine
Tagged
, babies, Darwin's Black Box, Darwinism, Dover trial, Galápagos Islands, gender dysphoria, Gerd Müller, Immune System, Irreducible Complexity, Michael Behe, Newspeak, On the Origin of Species, Paul Nelson, Royal Society, transgenderism, Zombie Science (book)}

What the Darwin Lobby and the Transgender Lobby Have in Common

_{Jonathan Wells
July 14, 2021

Evolution, Medicine

9}

Some ideologies (such as Darwinism) wrap themselves in the mantle of science even though they lack — or are inconsistent with — the evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
July 13, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, angels, bacteria, blood clotting, Discovery Institute, intelligent design, Michael Behe, movie producers, primordial soup, proteins, Secrets of the Cell with Michael Behe, YouTube videos}

Michael Behe Needs Some Angelic Help

_{John G. West
July 13, 2021

Intelligent Design

3}

Become a movie producer and help bring the evidence of intelligent design to millions of people in the next year. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
July 11, 2021

Categories
Biology
Engineering
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Andrew McDiarmid, cilia, Darwin's Black Box, evolution, Evolution News, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, irreducibly complex systems, Michael Behe, molecular machines, podcast, The Edge of Evolution}

Michael Behe and Cilia 3.0 … or, Irreducible Complexity Cubed

_{Jonathan Witt
July 11, 2021

Biology, Engineering, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The once seemingly humble cilium is actually even more irreducibly complex than Dr. Behe suggested in his first book. Read More ›