inscription-on-the-courthouse-stockpack-adobe-stock-130150336-stockpack-adobestock Type post Author Casey Luskin Date December 18, 2025 CategoriesHistory of ScienceIntelligent DesignLegal Science (jurisprudence) Tagged , American Scientist, avida, Caucasians, creationists, Dover trial, education, Edwards v. Aguillard, Ethiopian, Eugenie Scott, genetic algorithms, intelligent design, iron ore, Jay Wexler, Kitzmiller v. Dover, law, methodological naturalism, Michigan State University, natural, NOMA, Of Pandas and People, philosophers, Robert Pennock, Scopes trial, Stephen Jay Gould, supernatural, Supreme Court, terminology, Winston Ewert, Young Earth Creationism On Scopes and Dover Trials, Philosopher Robert Pennock Twists History and Science Casey Luskin and John Bloom December 18, 2025 History of Science, Intelligent Design, Legal Science (jurisprudence) 17 There is no reason for Pennock’s rule other than to short-circuit the origins debate and rule intelligent design out-of-court without addressing the evidence. Read More ›
judge-in-court-room-writing-report-judge-hammer-stockpack-ad-609669109-stockpack-adobestock Type post Author Sarah Chaffee Date December 16, 2025 CategoriesIntelligent DesignLegal Science (jurisprudence) Tagged , Casey Luskin, David dewolf, evolution, intelligent design, Jay Wexler, John West, Judge John Jones, Judgment Day, judicial activism, Kitzmiller v. Dover, religion, scientific community, Supreme Court, Ten Myths About Dover, Time Magazine Ten Myths About Dover: No. 6, “Judge Jones, No Activist, Stayed Strictly Within Authority” Sarah Chaffee December 16, 2025 Intelligent Design, Legal Science (jurisprudence) 13 Federal judges are to decide constitutional questions. Deciding what is and is not science is a matter for philosophers of science. Read More ›
