Tag: human eye | Page 2 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Cornelius Hunter

Date
January 21, 2022

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Metaphysics
Tagged
, birds, empirical science, evolution, glaucoma, human eye, hunters, intelligent design, John Ray, light, Nathan Lents, photoreceptor cells, retina, vision}

Did Nathan Lents Refute Design?

_{Cornelius Hunter
January 21, 2022

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Metaphysics

5}

Today our knowledge of the eye’s design is far more detailed. Particularly striking are the incredible mechanisms at the molecular level. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Otangelo Grasso

Date
February 24, 2020

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __edited, chromophore, complexity, Darwinists, enzymes, evolution, Frontiers in Plant Science, green algae, human brain, human eye, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jonathan Wells, lipid bilayer, lysine, Michael Behe, natural selection, Nature Communications, proteins, Trends in Biochemical Sciences}

The Evolution of the Eye, Demystified

_{Otangelo Grasso
February 24, 2020

Evolution, Intelligent Design

8}

Michael Behe in 2006 and Jonathan Wells in 2017 wrote about the irreducible complexity of the light-sensing cascade that makes vision possible. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 12, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Physical Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, "poor design", arXiv, evolution, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, light, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Nathan Lents, observer, photon, quantum mechanics, Research, Richard Dawkins, vision, Zombie Science (book), zombies}

Human Eye, that “Clunky Design,” to be Used to Confirm, or Disconfirm, Quantum Mechanics

_{David Klinghoffer
July 12, 2018

Intelligent Design, Physical Sciences

4}

It can detect a single photon. It can test the foundations of our understanding of nature. And it is also a piece of “botched” work by evolution? Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
May 23, 2018

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Catholicism and Evolution, criminal justice, CUNY, Darwin's Black Box, death, decay, Douglas Axe, eyeglasses, Father Michael Chaberek, flat earth, Forensics, human eye, intelligent design, John Jay College, John Paul II, Jonathan Wells, junk DNA, maxillary sinus, Michael Behe, Michael Egnor, Nathan Lents, neurosurgeon, physiology, Pope Francis, Stephen Meyer, suffering, testicles, Wall Street Journal, William A. Dembski}

Straw Man: Nathan Lents Versus the Theory of Perfect Design

_{David Klinghoffer
May 23, 2018

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

6}

True, things go wrong with our bodies, with results that range from the tragic to the merely expensive or inconvenient. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
May 11, 2018

Categories
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Tagged
, __k-review, blood vessels, Douglas Futuyma, evolution, George Williams, Human Errors, human eye, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, Nathan Lents, photoreceptor cells, The Blind Watchmaker, Zombie Science (book)}

There You Go Again, Nathan Lents

_{Jonathan Wells
May 11, 2018

Intelligent Design, Life Sciences

4}

“The human eye is a well-tread [sic] example of how evolution can produce a clunky design,” writes Professor Lents. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Walter Myers III

Date
May 8, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, arthropods, bad design, birds, Christianity, eagle, eyes, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, natural selection, Richard Dawkins, vertebrates, Wall Street Journal, Wikipedia, Zombie Science (book)}

The Problem with “Bad Design” Arguments

_{Walter Myers III
May 8, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

6}

In a physical world there will be design constraints, so it is only realistic to expect tradeoffs. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Wells

Date
April 13, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, blind spot, capillaries, cephalopod, choriocapillaris, Douglas Futuyma, evolution, evolutionary biologists, evolutionary theory, George Williams, human eye, intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, Jonathan Losos, Kenneth Mason, Kenneth Miller, Nathan Lents, optic nerve, oxygen, photocell, photoreceptor cell, retina, retinal pigment epithelium, Richard Dawkins, Richard Young, Susan Singer, The Blind Watchmaker, toxins, vertebrate}

Is the Human Eye Really Evidence Against Intelligent Design?

_{Jonathan Wells
April 13, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

9}

Vertebrate eyes work reasonably well, Richard Dawkins conceded, but “it is the principle of the thing that would offend any tidy-minded engineer!” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
April 6, 2018

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Technology
Tagged
, __k-review, atheism, Biomimetics, birds, chick, chicken, Darwinists, evolution, eyeglasses, human eye, intelligent design, McGill University, proteins, sarcasm, Science Advances, The Guardian}

Eggshell’s Remarkable Design — A Tribute to Mindless Evolution?

_{David Klinghoffer
April 6, 2018

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Technology

4}

The key lies in a triple-layered structure and a protein called osteopontin. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
February 14, 2018

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Antony Flew, atheism, bad design, Darwinism, evolution, Finland, Heretic, human eye, intelligent design, Matti Leisola, religion, Richard Dawkins, science, The God Delusion, theism, theology, Thomas Nagel, vertebrate eye, vestigial structures}

A Heretical Bioengineer Asks: What Do the Darwinists Have to Hide?

_{Matti Leisola and Jonathan Witt
February 14, 2018

Evolution, Intelligent Design

4}

They argue our eyes are wired “backward,” a jerry-rigged fix compliments of blind evolution. But we now know that “backward wiring” actually improves oxygen flow. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
December 3, 2017

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Life Sciences
Technology
Tagged
, __k-review, Ann Gauger, antibodies, antigens, BIO-Complexity, evolution, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, human eye, intelligent design, Jonathan Bartlett, machines, Modern Synthesis, molecular machines, natural selection, Neo-Darwinism, proteins, Richard Dawkins, teleology, The Blind Watchmaker, The Selfish Gene}

Design (But Not Design) Is the New Unifying Principle of Biology

_{Science and Culture
December 3, 2017

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Life Sciences, Technology

5}

The human eye is for seeing, whether or not it has any effect on genetics. However, this common-sense view has a problem. Read More ›