Tag: evolutionists | Page 7 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Date
October 3, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, atheism, evolutionists, ID the Future, intelligent design, Ira Berkowitz, Jerry Coyne, Nonsense of a High Order, podcast, Rabbi Moshe Averick}

Rabbi Moshe Averick: Intelligent Design, Atheism, and Nonsense of a High Order

_{Science & Culture
October 3, 2021

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

Averick answers the who-designed-the-designer objection, and shows how questions about God and ID can’t be shoved aside as unimportant. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
October 1, 2021

Categories
Faith & Science
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Casey Luskin, Dover trial, evolution, evolutionists, ID the Future, intelligent design, New Atheists, New New Atheists, podcast, Robert Crowther, The God Delusion}

Comparing Intelligent Design and the New Atheists: Who’s Ahead?

_{David Klinghoffer
October 1, 2021

Faith & Science, Intelligent Design

1}

Dr. Luskin makes the interesting observation that the New Atheists took off initially following the Dover ruling, seemingly fueled by it. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
August 28, 2021

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, evolutionary theory, evolutionists, genome, ID the Future, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, junk DNA, podcast, Ray Bohlin, researchers, Seattle}

Diving into “the Genome’s Uncharted Territories”

_{Science & Culture
August 28, 2021

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

Jonathan Wells sat down with host and fellow biologist Ray Bohlin at the August 2021 Insiders’ Briefing near Seattle. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
July 25, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Origin of Life
Tagged
, blind processes, Brian Miller, Brownian motion, cell death, Dave Farina, entropy, Eric Anderson, evolutionists, first cell, homochirality, ID the Future, intelligent design, interactome, James Tour, molecular machines, podcast, researchers}

More on James Tour’s Abiogenesis YouTube Series

_{Science & Culture
July 25, 2021

Intelligent Design, Origin of Life

1}

Brian Miller discusses the Levinthal paradox of the interactome, the long odds of blind processes assembling the first cell, and the challenge of cell death. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
July 23, 2021

Categories
Bioethics
Evolution
Tagged
, alt-right, Center for Science and Culture, Charles Darwin, churches, Darwinism, evolutionists, ID the Future, Mike Keas, Peter Singer, podcast, pseudoscience, Racism, Richard Weikart, scientific racism, statues, V.I. Lenin, white nationalists}

Darwinism and “No Lives Matter”

_{David Klinghoffer
July 23, 2021

Bioethics, Evolution

3}

While most evolutionists today reject scientific racism, with exceptions like James Watson — they have no necessary reason for doing so. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 16, 2021

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, biologists, CELS 2021, Center for Science and Culture, Conference on Engineering in Living Systems, DNA, engineers, evolutionists, feedback loops, Jonathan Bartlett, junk DNA, logic gates, Mind Matters, Systems Biology}

What Biologists Can Learn from Engineers, and Vice Versa

_{David Klinghoffer
June 16, 2021

Biology, Intelligent Design

2}

If biologists had thought more like engineers, stumbling into the myth of "Junk DNA" might have been avoided. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Günter Bechly

Date
June 14, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, abominable mystery, angiosperms, Charles Darwin, Cretaceous Period, evolution, evolutionists, flowering plants, fossil record, intelligent design, Joseph Hooker, molecular clocks, Nature Ecology & Evolution, neo-Darwinian mechanism, Neo-Darwinism, New Scientist, Richard Buggs}

Darwin’s “Abominable Mystery”: Jurassic Flowering Plants After All?

_{Günter Bechly
June 14, 2021

Evolution

4}

This year a new article by Silvestro et al. (2021), "Fossil data support a pre-Cretaceous origin of flowering plants," was published. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
June 8, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, algorithms, David Wolpert, DiscoveryU, Douglas Axe, evolution, evolutionary biology, evolutionists, genes, insight, intelligence, intelligent design, machine learning, natural selection, No Free Lunch, proteins, search, The Blind Watchmaker, unguided evolution}

Axe: Why “No Free Lunch” for Darwin?

_{David Klinghoffer
June 8, 2021

Evolution, Intelligent Design

3}

That there is a design to life is intuitive, but most of us, if challenged on it, would want to be able to defend our intuition persuasively. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Jonathan Witt

Date
May 28, 2021

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, Cambridge University, Daniel Reeves, evolutionists, HarperOne, ID the Future, intellignet design, podcast, Return of the God Hypothesis, Stephen Meyer}

God Hypothesis: Stephen Meyer Answers Your Questions

_{Jonathan Witt
May 28, 2021

Intelligent Design

1}

Daniel Reeves emceed, and in his introductory conversation with Meyer the two discuss a tidbit about Meyer’s time at Cambridge when he was working on his PhD. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Date
May 7, 2021

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, blood pressure, blood vessels, carpal tunnel syndrome, Charles Darwin, circadian rhythms, evolution, evolutionists, genes, giraffe’s neck, giraffes, J.P. Moreland, Lamarckism, mutations, nerves, Science (journal), Science Advances, The Scientist, University of Copenhagen}

Giraffe Genome Is Not Evolutionary

_{Science & Culture
May 7, 2021

Evolution

7}

Ah, the giraffe. Darwin put his mechanism at war with Lamarck’s to explain the giraffe’s long neck. Evolutionists are still battling over the question. Read More ›