Tag: Darwin Devolves | Page 16 | Science and Culture Today

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 19, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, ACLU, birds, Boston Review, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, evolution, Evolution News, exaptation, fish, H. Allen Orr, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Judge John E. Jones, Kenneth Miller, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, mammals, Michael Behe, mousetrap, Nathan Lents, ossicles, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), swim bladder}

Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation

_{Casey Luskin
February 19, 2019

Evolution, Intelligent Design

10}

Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 18, 2019

Categories
Biochemistry
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, Eric Metaxas, evolution, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Socrates in the City}

Behe, Metaxas: Socrates in the City

_{David Klinghoffer
February 18, 2019

Biochemistry, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The evening, February 27, in Bethlehem, PA, promises to be so entertaining that, well, tickets went fast. The good news is you can join the waiting list! Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 18, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, evolution, intelligent design, John West, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, National Academy of Sciences, Richard Lenski, Science (journal)}

Darwin Devolves Rides a Wave; One Week Left to Pre-order and Get the Perks!

_{David Klinghoffer
February 18, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

2}

I’m trying to think of a book that provoked as much discussion and debate — before it is even published. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
John G. West

Date
February 17, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, ACLU, Arthur Hunt, chloroquine, common ancestry, Darwin Devolves, Debating Darwin's Doubt, Discovery Institute, Durrett and Schmidt, Evangelical Christianity, God and Evolution, Harrisburg, intelligent design, Irreducible Complexity, Jay Richards, Laurence Moran, Lex Luthor, Michael Behe, natural selection, Richard Lenski, Robert L. Summers, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Signature of Controversy, Stephen Meyer}

In the Controversy over Intelligent Design, Seeking Genuine Dialogue

_{John G. West
February 17, 2019

Intelligent Design

13}

To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 15, 2019

Categories
Biology
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, Peaceful Science, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal)}

Conversation Evolves: Richard Lenski Responds to Michael Behe

_{David Klinghoffer
February 15, 2019

Biology, Intelligent Design

2}

Yes, Nathan Lents, finally we agree: it is “A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution.” Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 15, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, DNA, evolution, Evolution News, intelligent design, Michael Behe, Response to Criticism, video course}

Behe’s Darwin Devolves — How to Follow the Criticisms and Responses

_{David Klinghoffer
February 15, 2019

Biology, Evolution, Intelligent Design

1}

The conversation is already well underway, with much more stimulation to come. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, blood-clotting cascade, Cambridge University Press, chloroquine, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Black Box, E. coli, Ernst Mayr, evolution, exaptation, Finding Darwin's God, gene duplication, hemoglobin, Hox genes, Kenneth Miller, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mammals, mutations, myoglobin, Nathan Lents, natural selection, neo-Darwinian evolution, olfaction, plasminogen, PLoS Genetics, primates, Response to Criticism, ribose, Richard Lenski, Robert L. Summers, Russell Doolittle, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), The Edge of Evolution, The Quarterly Review of Biology}

Train Wreck of a Review: A Response to Lenski et al. in Science

_{Michael Behe
February 14, 2019

Evolution

30}

Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Michael Behe

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Biology
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, APOB, Cell (journal), Darwin Devolves, Darwinists, evolution, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, gene regulation, genes, humans, Jerry Coyne, Long Term Evolution Experiment, mice, Nathan Lents, polar bears, population genomics, Response to Criticism, Richard Lenski, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Shiping Liu, Svalbard}

Coyne and Polar Bears: Why You Should Never Rely on Incompetent Reviewers

_{Michael Behe
February 14, 2019

Biology, Evolution

5}

A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
Casey Luskin

Date
February 14, 2019

Categories
Evolution
Tagged
, __k-review, antibiotic resistance, chloroquine, chloroquine complexity cluster, Darwin Devolves, Darwinian evolution, evidence, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, First Rule of Adaptive Evolution, Genetics (journal), intelligent design, Jerry Coyne, John West, Kenneth Miller, malaria, Michael Behe, Nathan Lents, natural selection, Paul Gross, Plasmodium falciparum, point mutations, Response to Criticism, Richard Dawkins, Richard Lenski, Robert L. Summers, S. Joshua Swamidass, Science (journal), Sean Carroll, The Edge of Evolution, The Greatest Show on Earth, theory, University of Georgia}

Science Review Offers False Accusations about Chloroquine Resistance

_{Casey Luskin
February 14, 2019

Evolution

21}

In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence. Read More ›

^{Type
post

Author
David Klinghoffer

Date
February 13, 2019

Categories
Intelligent Design
Tagged
, __k-review, Ben Shapiro, creationists, Darwin Devolves, Darwin's Doubt, DNA, evolution, intelligent design, Jonathan Wells, laymen, Michael Behe, podcast, proteins, radio, Richard Dawkins, Scientific Dissent From Darwinism, scientists, Signature in the Cell, social anxiety, Stephen Meyer, William A. Dembski}

Ben Shapiro Rethinks Life’s Origins — Applauds Meyer’s Signature in the Cell

_{David Klinghoffer
February 13, 2019

Intelligent Design

3}

Shapiro accepts the idea of evolution, but he also appreciates that intelligent design is ultimately a way of understanding evolution, the mechanism that drives it. Read More ›